Investigating the patterns of tree cover and density in relation to abiotic and biotic factors in Kruger National Park

Abstract Across savanna ecosystems worldwide, the decline of large trees and the rapid expansion of shrubs present major conservation challenges. These trends are especially pronounced in South Africa's Kruger National Park (KNP), the country's largest protected area. To quantify their extent and identify their drivers, we conducted a spatial assessment of tree cover and density across KNP from 2011 until 2022. We then evaluated how these response variables are influenced by abiotic factors, including fire, climate, soil, and geology, and by biotic factors, such as the densities of African elephant adult male bulls and herds, including females and calves. We defined trees as land‐cover elements that cast a distinct shadow and stand taller than 5 m. Using Collect Earth, an open‐source software for augmented visual interpretation of high‐resolution satellite imagery, we assessed tree cover and density on 4258 plots of 0.5 ha each. We recorded 27,918 trees, equivalent to an average density of 13 trees/ha. Counts in each plot were truncated to a maximum of 30 individuals. We validated our estimates of tree cover and height against independent, high‐resolution airborne LiDAR measurements, which yielded an RMSE of 8.89% for trees taller than 3 m. The relative influence of selected predictors on tree cover and density was analyzed through logistic and survival regressions. Geology had the greatest influence on tree distribution, where both tree cover and density were higher on nutrient‐poor granitic substrates than on nutrient‐rich basalts. Tree cover and density were higher in areas with low fire frequency, close to main rivers, and with higher sand content in the soil. The mean annual rainfall showed a positive correlation with tree cover, while it had a negative correlation with the number of trees. Elephant bulls were found to be negatively correlated with both tree cover and density. In contrast, elephant herds exhibited a positive correlation with tree cover and density. This study highlights the importance of understanding the effects of multiple factors on tree distribution and aims to provide a baseline for assessing tree cover and density across KNP to support ongoing tree management strategies and contribute to future conservation priorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosphere
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70421
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the patterns of tree cover and density in relation to abiotic and biotic factors in Kruger National Park

Tercia Strydom, Sandra MacFadyen, Giacomo D’Ammando, Izak P. J. Smit et al.
Ecosphere
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Investigating the patterns of tree cover and density in relation to abiotic and biotic factors in Kruger National Park

Tercia Strydom, Sandra MacFadyen, Giacomo D’Ammando, Izak P. J. Smit, Tullia Riccardi, Andrew B. Davies, Luca Malatesta, Fabio Attorre, Alessio Farcomeni, Lucy Wilson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Across savanna ecosystems worldwide, the decline of large trees and the rapid expansion of shrubs present major conservation challenges. These trends are especially pronounced in South Africa's Kruger National Park (KNP), the country's largest protected area. To quantify their extent and identify their drivers, we conducted a spatial assessment of tree cover and density across KNP from 2011 until 2022. We then evaluated how these response variables are influenced by abiotic factors, including fire, climate, soil, and geology, and by biotic factors, such as the densities of African elephant adult male bulls and herds, including females and calves. We defined trees as land‐cover elements that cast a distinct shadow and stand taller than 5 m. Using Collect Earth, an open‐source software for augmented visual interpretation of high‐resolution satellite imagery, we assessed tree cover and density on 4258 plots of 0.5 ha each. We recorded 27,918 trees, equivalent to an average density of 13 trees/ha. Counts in each plot were truncated to a maximum of 30 individuals. We validated our estimates of tree cover and height against independent, high‐resolution airborne LiDAR measurements, which yielded an RMSE of 8.89% for trees taller than 3 m. The relative influence of selected predictors on tree cover and density was analyzed through logistic and survival regressions. Geology had the greatest influence on tree distribution, where both tree cover and density were higher on nutrient‐poor granitic substrates than on nutrient‐rich basalts. Tree cover and density were higher in areas with low fire frequency, close to main rivers, and with higher sand content in the soil. The mean annual rainfall showed a positive correlation with tree cover, while it had a negative correlation with the number of trees. Elephant bulls were found to be negatively correlated with both tree cover and density. In contrast, elephant herds exhibited a positive correlation with tree cover and density. This study highlights the importance of understanding the effects of multiple factors on tree distribution and aims to provide a baseline for assessing tree cover and density across KNP to support ongoing tree management strategies and contribute to future conservation priorities.

EcosphereVol. 16(11)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), South African National Parks (ZA), Harvard University (US), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Scientific Services (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
National Research Foundation, Sapienza Università di Roma
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.