Year‐Round Evaluation of the Conservation Potential of Seed‐Rich Field Margins Under Agri‐Environmental Schemes for Farmland Birds, European Hares, and Common Hamsters

Field margins on arable land, such as seed-rich strips (SRS), are an important and widely implemented conservation measure under agri-environment schemes. They are intended to contribute to the provision of scarce food resources and shelter for various farmland species. Although SRS are primarily designed to provide critical resources for wildlife during the winter, they may also contribute to biodiversity conservation throughout the year and across the full annual cycle of farmland species. However, empirical evaluation of their conservation potential over the annual cycle and across multiple taxa is missing. Therefore, in this study, we conducted a year-round assessment of the conservation potential of SRS for several avian (farmland birds and seed-eating species in particular) and mammalian (European hares and common hamsters) farmland species in arable-dominated agricultural landscapes. Moreover, we investigated the role of the habitat context (i.e., SRS placed along farmland hedges or inside crop fields) of SRS on species abundance and diversity. Our results showed that during the entire year, SRS significantly increased farmland bird abundance and species diversity (including seed-eating species), as well as European hare and common hamster abundance, compared to the controls (i.e., conventionally managed arable land). The SRS utilization varied seasonally, with bird abundance being significantly higher from late summer through winter, while European hare abundance increased significantly only in the autumn and winter months. Notably, the most substantial differences in farmland bird diversity between the SRS and control areas were observed from August to November, whereas the greatest disparities in bird abundance occurred during the winter months, particularly from December to February. The habitat context of the plots (both SRS and controls) generally did not affect the abundance nor species diversity of farmland birds. However, the abundance and species diversity of seed-eating birds were higher in plots located along hedges. The opposite pattern was found for the European hare. We conclude that implementing SRS could significantly help in the conservation of avian and mammalian species in arable farmlands. This is true not only in the autumn and winter, when the dense and structurally complex vegetation in SRS offers abundant nutrient-rich seeds and cover, but also in the summer, when SRS provide invertebrates for a variety of farmland species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72492
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Year‐Round Evaluation of the Conservation Potential of Seed‐Rich Field Margins Under Agri‐Environmental Schemes for Farmland Birds, European Hares, and Common Hamsters

Peter Samaš, Jan Cukor, Martin Šálek, Ondřej Boháč
Ecology and Evolution
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Year‐Round Evaluation of the Conservation Potential of Seed‐Rich Field Margins Under Agri‐Environmental Schemes for Farmland Birds, European Hares, and Common Hamsters

Peter Samaš, Jan Cukor, Martin Šálek, Ondřej Boháč
article en

Abstract

Field margins on arable land, such as seed-rich strips (SRS), are an important and widely implemented conservation measure under agri-environment schemes. They are intended to contribute to the provision of scarce food resources and shelter for various farmland species. Although SRS are primarily designed to provide critical resources for wildlife during the winter, they may also contribute to biodiversity conservation throughout the year and across the full annual cycle of farmland species. However, empirical evaluation of their conservation potential over the annual cycle and across multiple taxa is missing. Therefore, in this study, we conducted a year-round assessment of the conservation potential of SRS for several avian (farmland birds and seed-eating species in particular) and mammalian (European hares and common hamsters) farmland species in arable-dominated agricultural landscapes. Moreover, we investigated the role of the habitat context (i.e., SRS placed along farmland hedges or inside crop fields) of SRS on species abundance and diversity. Our results showed that during the entire year, SRS significantly increased farmland bird abundance and species diversity (including seed-eating species), as well as European hare and common hamster abundance, compared to the controls (i.e., conventionally managed arable land). The SRS utilization varied seasonally, with bird abundance being significantly higher from late summer through winter, while European hare abundance increased significantly only in the autumn and winter months. Notably, the most substantial differences in farmland bird diversity between the SRS and control areas were observed from August to November, whereas the greatest disparities in bird abundance occurred during the winter months, particularly from December to February. The habitat context of the plots (both SRS and controls) generally did not affect the abundance nor species diversity of farmland birds. However, the abundance and species diversity of seed-eating birds were higher in plots located along hedges. The opposite pattern was found for the European hare. We conclude that implementing SRS could significantly help in the conservation of avian and mammalian species in arable farmlands. This is true not only in the autumn and winter, when the dense and structurally complex vegetation in SRS offers abundant nutrient-rich seeds and cover, but also in the summer, when SRS provide invertebrates for a variety of farmland species.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(11)
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), Forestry and Game Management Research Institute (CZ), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology (CZ), Czech Society for Ornithology (CZ)
Akademie Věd České Republiky
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.