In-Situ Quality Monitoring in LPBF via Melt-Pool Radiation: Compressive Sampling and Deep Feature Extraction

In-situ monitoring methods and deep learning models are increasingly being used for the quality assessment of parts fabricated using laser powder bed fusion to overcome the limitations of poor process repeatability. However, the massive data collection required for part-quality monitoring results in high transmission loads and storage costs. To address this problem, this study utilized the compressed sensing theory to acquire compressed photodiode signals. These signals were then used to train and test convolutional neural networks (CNN) to identify the lack-of-fusion, normal, and keyhole modes. At a compressive-sampling rate of 25%, the classification accuracy decreased from 93.1% (raw signals) to 79.3%. However, increasing the compression rate from 25% to 90% did not significantly decrease the classification accuracy. The linear mapping of the raw signal via a Gaussian measurement matrix causes coordinate information folding, thereby impairing the representation of latent features. Therefore, Gaussian process modeling was adopted for the features extracted using a pretrained CNN to mitigate the temporal information collapse and allow the compressed signals to achieve an accuracy comparable to that of the raw data. Furthermore, the sparsity and rank complexity of the melt-pool radiation signals were evaluated using sparse representation and principal component analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Additive Manufacturing Frontiers
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amf.2025.200269
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-Situ Quality Monitoring in LPBF via Melt-Pool Radiation: Compressive Sampling and Deep Feature Extraction

Vyacheslav A. Trofimov, Changhui Song, T.-S. Chen, Yunmian Xiao et al.
2 citations
Additive Manufacturing Frontiers
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
1.43
article

In-Situ Quality Monitoring in LPBF via Melt-Pool Radiation: Compressive Sampling and Deep Feature Extraction

Vyacheslav A. Trofimov, Changhui Song, T.-S. Chen, Yunmian Xiao, Zibin Liu, Hanxiang Zhou, Hui Li, Yongqiang Yang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In-situ monitoring methods and deep learning models are increasingly being used for the quality assessment of parts fabricated using laser powder bed fusion to overcome the limitations of poor process repeatability. However, the massive data collection required for part-quality monitoring results in high transmission loads and storage costs. To address this problem, this study utilized the compressed sensing theory to acquire compressed photodiode signals. These signals were then used to train and test convolutional neural networks (CNN) to identify the lack-of-fusion, normal, and keyhole modes. At a compressive-sampling rate of 25%, the classification accuracy decreased from 93.1% (raw signals) to 79.3%. However, increasing the compression rate from 25% to 90% did not significantly decrease the classification accuracy. The linear mapping of the raw signal via a Gaussian measurement matrix causes coordinate information folding, thereby impairing the representation of latent features. Therefore, Gaussian process modeling was adopted for the features extracted using a pretrained CNN to mitigate the temporal information collapse and allow the compressed signals to achieve an accuracy comparable to that of the raw data. Furthermore, the sparsity and rank complexity of the melt-pool radiation signals were evaluated using sparse representation and principal component analysis.

Additive Manufacturing Frontiers
Zhejiang Ocean University (CN), Wuhan University (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.