Scammer Participants and AI-Assisted Interviews in Qualitative Health Research: An Example From a Study of Expectant Parents With a Rare Genetic Condition

Online interviewing has allowed cost-effective data collection and access to diverse, geographically dispersed populations. However, these benefits come with significant risks to research integrity, particularly in terms of attracting potential scammer participants—individuals who volunteer to take part in research by creating a false identity that fits the eligibility criteria for a research study. This paper explores our experiences in conducting online interviews for a qualitative health research study involving expectant parents with a rare genetic condition. We outline the strategies we implemented to deter fraudulent interest and participation at different stages of recruitment and data collection and share our critical reflections on how we managed these challenges. This paper highlights how Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted software may help scammers to evade detection, representing a new external threat to the validity with online qualitative research. We provide practical recommendations for safeguarding qualitative research in the digital age, along with a checklist for the design stage, informed by recent technological advancements and lessons learned from our study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251390983
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scammer Participants and AI-Assisted Interviews in Qualitative Health Research: An Example From a Study of Expectant Parents With a Rare Genetic Condition

Shruti Garg, Debbie Smith, Ming Wai Wan, Gamze Kaplan
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Scammer Participants and AI-Assisted Interviews in Qualitative Health Research: An Example From a Study of Expectant Parents With a Rare Genetic Condition

Shruti Garg, Debbie Smith, Ming Wai Wan, Gamze Kaplan
article en

Abstract

Online interviewing has allowed cost-effective data collection and access to diverse, geographically dispersed populations. However, these benefits come with significant risks to research integrity, particularly in terms of attracting potential scammer participants—individuals who volunteer to take part in research by creating a false identity that fits the eligibility criteria for a research study. This paper explores our experiences in conducting online interviews for a qualitative health research study involving expectant parents with a rare genetic condition. We outline the strategies we implemented to deter fraudulent interest and participation at different stages of recruitment and data collection and share our critical reflections on how we managed these challenges. This paper highlights how Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted software may help scammers to evade detection, representing a new external threat to the validity with online qualitative research. We provide practical recommendations for safeguarding qualitative research in the digital age, along with a checklist for the design stage, informed by recent technological advancements and lessons learned from our study.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 24
University of Manchester (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.