The Family Lie: Afterword to the Foreword by Susan Marks

Abstract I wrote these thoughts in response to Susan Marks’ critique of the metaphor of the world as a family. I read Marks’ article while a genocide was raging relentlessly, so, of course, my thoughts revolved around the failure of the international community and of international law and its institutions to do anything to stop it. What kind of family fails so dramatically at curbing such extreme violence, I wondered. Using a psychoanalytic lens, I analyse the development of the superego in individuals, in groups and, finally (and most unsuccessfully), in states. Adding to Marks’ suggestion for a sublation of the family, I suggest a sublation of international law and a move away from its focus on states to a focus on individuals. My article deplores the insistence on homogeneity in groups, whether the group is formed around family, kinship, ethnic identity, religion, race or nationhood. Such insistence inevitably leads to exclusions and, in the worst instances, to genocide.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of International Law
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaf055
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Family Lie: Afterword to the Foreword by Susan Marks

Μαρία Αριστοδήμου
European Journal of International Law
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

The Family Lie: Afterword to the Foreword by Susan Marks

Μαρία Αριστοδήμου
article en

Abstract

Abstract I wrote these thoughts in response to Susan Marks’ critique of the metaphor of the world as a family. I read Marks’ article while a genocide was raging relentlessly, so, of course, my thoughts revolved around the failure of the international community and of international law and its institutions to do anything to stop it. What kind of family fails so dramatically at curbing such extreme violence, I wondered. Using a psychoanalytic lens, I analyse the development of the superego in individuals, in groups and, finally (and most unsuccessfully), in states. Adding to Marks’ suggestion for a sublation of the family, I suggest a sublation of international law and a move away from its focus on states to a focus on individuals. My article deplores the insistence on homogeneity in groups, whether the group is formed around family, kinship, ethnic identity, religion, race or nationhood. Such insistence inevitably leads to exclusions and, in the worst instances, to genocide.

European Journal of International LawVol. 36(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.