Parent-Reported Cosmetic Satisfaction Assessment Following Surgical Treatment of Single-Suture Craniosynostosis

Background:As Egypt moves toward universal health coverage, the effective use of electronic medical records (EMRs) has become increasingly vital to ensuring quality and safety in healthcare delivery. Yet, user satisfaction and perceptions of usability often hinge on how work is structured within clinical settings.Objective:This study aimed to assess how healthcare professionals in Port Said, Egypt, perceive the usability of EMR interface and how their satisfaction is shaped by the design of their work environments under the Universal Health Insurance (UHI) system.Methods:A cross-sectional descriptive study with analytical components was conducted among 532 healthcare professionals working in UHI-affiliated primary and secondary healthcare facilities in Port-Said, Egypt. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire that combined the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS) and the Short Version of the Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ-S). Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric methods in SPSS version 26.Conclusion:Moderate satisfaction levels with EMRs suggest improvements, particularly in system responsiveness and user interface design, are needed. Enhancing work design—especially task autonomy and social feedback—could improve EMR usability and user engagement. Policymakers should consider integrating work design considerations into future EMR implementation efforts within the UHI framework to support broader system adoption and long-term success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine Updates
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/muj.2025.433459.1273
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parent-Reported Cosmetic Satisfaction Assessment Following Surgical Treatment of Single-Suture Craniosynostosis

Mohamed El‐Beltagy, Amr Abu Elfadle, Ayman Galhom, Yasser Hamdy et al.
Medicine Updates
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

Parent-Reported Cosmetic Satisfaction Assessment Following Surgical Treatment of Single-Suture Craniosynostosis

Mohamed El‐Beltagy, Amr Abu Elfadle, Ayman Galhom, Yasser Hamdy, Youssef A. Ismail, Ahmed Nada
article en

Abstract

Background:As Egypt moves toward universal health coverage, the effective use of electronic medical records (EMRs) has become increasingly vital to ensuring quality and safety in healthcare delivery. Yet, user satisfaction and perceptions of usability often hinge on how work is structured within clinical settings.Objective:This study aimed to assess how healthcare professionals in Port Said, Egypt, perceive the usability of EMR interface and how their satisfaction is shaped by the design of their work environments under the Universal Health Insurance (UHI) system.Methods:A cross-sectional descriptive study with analytical components was conducted among 532 healthcare professionals working in UHI-affiliated primary and secondary healthcare facilities in Port-Said, Egypt. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire that combined the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS) and the Short Version of the Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ-S). Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric methods in SPSS version 26.Conclusion:Moderate satisfaction levels with EMRs suggest improvements, particularly in system responsiveness and user interface design, are needed. Enhancing work design—especially task autonomy and social feedback—could improve EMR usability and user engagement. Policymakers should consider integrating work design considerations into future EMR implementation efforts within the UHI framework to support broader system adoption and long-term success.

Medicine UpdatesVol. 0(0)
Cairo University (EG), Port Said University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.