Development, characterization and pharmacodynamic evaluation of refined liquisolid system of glimepiride for bioequivalent tablet

Objective: This study explores the potential of a refined liquisolid system (RLS) for formulating glimepiride tablets, evaluating its drug release profile and pharmacodynamic effects in mice compared to the reference brand, Amaryl®.Background: Glimepiride, a third-generation sulfonylurea, is a weakly acidic hypoglycemic drug that falls under Class II in the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS). Despite its effectiveness, glimepiride exhibits low solubility and high permeability, leading to inconsistent therapeutic outcomes. Materials and methods: The RLS formulations of glimepiride tablets were developed using 12 different combinations, incorporating Avicel PH 102 or Neusilin as adsorbents, propylene glycol or dimethyl sulfoxide as solvents, and croscarmellose sodium as a disintegrant. Various ratios of excipients to the active ingredient were evaluated, and the tablets were produced through direct compression. The formulations underwent dissolution testing in three simulated gastrointestinal fluids (pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8), two biorelevant media, and pharmacodynamic evaluation in normoglycemic mice. The similarity factor (f2) was employed to compare the dissolution profiles of the formulations with the innovator brand. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC₀–₁₁ hours) and the mean maximum percentage reduction in blood glucose levels (%RBGL) of the RLS formulations were statistically compared to those of the reference. Results: The optimal glimepiride tablets were formulated using dimethyl sulfoxide as the solvent and either Avicel PH 102 or Neusilin as adsorbents. These RLS tablets demonstrated dissolution profiles closely matching those of the reference product, with similarity factor (f2) values exceeding 50. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant variation in %RBGL between the RLS tablets and the reference product (p > 0.05). Importantly, the glimepiride in the RLS formulation transitioned into an amorphous state. Conclusions: The RLS formulations offer a viable alternative for the industrial production of glimepiride tablets, providing a comparable therapeutic performance to the reference brand while potentially addressing solubility challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/epj.2025.382620.1101
Primary Topic
Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development, characterization and pharmacodynamic evaluation of refined liquisolid system of glimepiride for bioequivalent tablet

Ayu Shabrina, Malinda Prihantini, Yulias Ninik Windriyati, Sri Sutji Susilowati et al.
Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal
Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
article

Development, characterization and pharmacodynamic evaluation of refined liquisolid system of glimepiride for bioequivalent tablet

Ayu Shabrina, Malinda Prihantini, Yulias Ninik Windriyati, Sri Sutji Susilowati, Danang Novianto Wibowo
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study explores the potential of a refined liquisolid system (RLS) for formulating glimepiride tablets, evaluating its drug release profile and pharmacodynamic effects in mice compared to the reference brand, Amaryl®.Background: Glimepiride, a third-generation sulfonylurea, is a weakly acidic hypoglycemic drug that falls under Class II in the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS). Despite its effectiveness, glimepiride exhibits low solubility and high permeability, leading to inconsistent therapeutic outcomes. Materials and methods: The RLS formulations of glimepiride tablets were developed using 12 different combinations, incorporating Avicel PH 102 or Neusilin as adsorbents, propylene glycol or dimethyl sulfoxide as solvents, and croscarmellose sodium as a disintegrant. Various ratios of excipients to the active ingredient were evaluated, and the tablets were produced through direct compression. The formulations underwent dissolution testing in three simulated gastrointestinal fluids (pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8), two biorelevant media, and pharmacodynamic evaluation in normoglycemic mice. The similarity factor (f2) was employed to compare the dissolution profiles of the formulations with the innovator brand. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC₀–₁₁ hours) and the mean maximum percentage reduction in blood glucose levels (%RBGL) of the RLS formulations were statistically compared to those of the reference. Results: The optimal glimepiride tablets were formulated using dimethyl sulfoxide as the solvent and either Avicel PH 102 or Neusilin as adsorbents. These RLS tablets demonstrated dissolution profiles closely matching those of the reference product, with similarity factor (f2) values exceeding 50. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant variation in %RBGL between the RLS tablets and the reference product (p > 0.05). Importantly, the glimepiride in the RLS formulation transitioned into an amorphous state. Conclusions: The RLS formulations offer a viable alternative for the industrial production of glimepiride tablets, providing a comparable therapeutic performance to the reference brand while potentially addressing solubility challenges.

Egyptian Pharmaceutical JournalVol. 0(0)
Universitas Wahid Hasyim (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.