Errant Marks: Misreading, Marginalia, and Early Modern Women's Book Use

ABSTRACT: This article examines early modern women's marginalia that take the form of scribble, doodles, pen trials, smudges, and stains, often found on the pastedowns and endpapers of books. It argues that these pages of "errant marks" are examples of early modern women's authorship, correcting misreadings of this commonly encountered material that have either ignored such marks or dismissed them as examples of private inattention, disconnected from the textual and material worlds of their subject and book. By positioning these marginalia as simultaneously generic, formally diverse, and specific to particular authorial contexts, more expansive models can be developed of the forms that constitute marginalia and the agents who are considered to be marginalists, including the semi-literate or "letterate" and those educated outside the humanist schoolroom. These marks move beyond the marginalia widely recognized as humanist practice to encompass new kinds and contexts of textual marking that include practice, trial, and error as well as purposeful, public, and goal-oriented annotations performed by new kinds of authors including women, children, and the nonelite.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Huntington Library Quarterly
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2024.a974729
Primary Topic
Early Modern Women Writers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Errant Marks: Misreading, Marginalia, and Early Modern Women's Book Use

Rosalind Smith
Huntington Library Quarterly
Early Modern Women Writers
article

Errant Marks: Misreading, Marginalia, and Early Modern Women's Book Use

Rosalind Smith
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This article examines early modern women's marginalia that take the form of scribble, doodles, pen trials, smudges, and stains, often found on the pastedowns and endpapers of books. It argues that these pages of "errant marks" are examples of early modern women's authorship, correcting misreadings of this commonly encountered material that have either ignored such marks or dismissed them as examples of private inattention, disconnected from the textual and material worlds of their subject and book. By positioning these marginalia as simultaneously generic, formally diverse, and specific to particular authorial contexts, more expansive models can be developed of the forms that constitute marginalia and the agents who are considered to be marginalists, including the semi-literate or "letterate" and those educated outside the humanist schoolroom. These marks move beyond the marginalia widely recognized as humanist practice to encompass new kinds and contexts of textual marking that include practice, trial, and error as well as purposeful, public, and goal-oriented annotations performed by new kinds of authors including women, children, and the nonelite.

Huntington Library QuarterlyVol. 87(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Early Modern Women Writers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.