Reading "Rotennness": Jonathan Swift and Textual Error

ABSTRACT: This essay argues that textual error is central to Jonathan Swift's satirical and epistemological strategies in A Tale of a Tub . Attending to both obvious typographical mistakes and less perceptible "clean errors," the essay demonstrates how Swift stages corruption as inherent to modern print culture, and, in doing so, invites readers to engage critically with imperfection. Rather than presenting error as an obstacle to understanding, Swift mobilizes it as a means of testing interpretive agility. Drawing on early editions, errata lists, and the history of eighteenth-century print correction, this essay explores how Swift's satire depends on readers' ability to navigate corrupted texts. In its final section, the essay turns to machine reading with tools such as optical character recognition (OCR) transcriptions and generative artificial intelligence (AI) to show how Swift's concerns resonate with contemporary text technologies. Machine-generated errors reveal the ongoing entanglement of meaning and mistake. By tracing critical and technological dimensions of textual corruption, the essay offers a new framework for understanding Swift's satire.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Huntington Library Quarterly
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2024.a974732
Primary Topic
Theater, Performance, and Music History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading "Rotennness": Jonathan Swift and Textual Error

Katie Lanning
Huntington Library Quarterly
Theater, Performance, and Music History
article

Reading "Rotennness": Jonathan Swift and Textual Error

Katie Lanning
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This essay argues that textual error is central to Jonathan Swift's satirical and epistemological strategies in A Tale of a Tub . Attending to both obvious typographical mistakes and less perceptible "clean errors," the essay demonstrates how Swift stages corruption as inherent to modern print culture, and, in doing so, invites readers to engage critically with imperfection. Rather than presenting error as an obstacle to understanding, Swift mobilizes it as a means of testing interpretive agility. Drawing on early editions, errata lists, and the history of eighteenth-century print correction, this essay explores how Swift's satire depends on readers' ability to navigate corrupted texts. In its final section, the essay turns to machine reading with tools such as optical character recognition (OCR) transcriptions and generative artificial intelligence (AI) to show how Swift's concerns resonate with contemporary text technologies. Machine-generated errors reveal the ongoing entanglement of meaning and mistake. By tracing critical and technological dimensions of textual corruption, the essay offers a new framework for understanding Swift's satire.

Huntington Library QuarterlyVol. 87(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Theater, Performance, and Music History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.