Morality of Mentality and Culture: a Registered Replication and Cross-Cultural Extension

Previous work has established that religious groups vary in the perceived moral status of “thought” versus behavior, with Protestants negatively evaluating people who entertain immoral thoughts more harshly than Jews. This work provided early evidence that religion is important in evaluating moral status. However, in the decades since this work, methodological and theoretical advances have suggested that a second glance might be necessary. In this Registered Report, we conducted a direct and conceptual replication of these earlier findings, including a cross-cultural extension in five countries, to investigate the influences of religious and national cultures on the relevance of immoral thoughts versus behaviors in evaluating the moral status of others. We replicate the original finding that American Protestants (but not Jews) consider immoral thoughts as negatively as actions. We also observe substantial variation across cultures and religions, such that Americans were generally less condemning of immoral thoughts than members of the same religion in other countries. These results provide clues for further theorizing about how both country and religion shape moral judgment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2025.2575543
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Morality of Mentality and Culture: a Registered Replication and Cross-Cultural Extension

David P. MacKinnon, Vassilis Saroglou, Jordan W. Moon, Michael Wu et al.
International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Morality of Mentality and Culture: a Registered Replication and Cross-Cultural Extension

David P. MacKinnon, Vassilis Saroglou, Jordan W. Moon, Michael Wu, Silvana Siqueira, Alexandra S. Wormley, Kathryn A. Johnson, Everton de Oliveira Maraldi, Gilad Hirschberger, Adam B. Cohen, Noé Pecol
article en

Abstract

Previous work has established that religious groups vary in the perceived moral status of “thought” versus behavior, with Protestants negatively evaluating people who entertain immoral thoughts more harshly than Jews. This work provided early evidence that religion is important in evaluating moral status. However, in the decades since this work, methodological and theoretical advances have suggested that a second glance might be necessary. In this Registered Report, we conducted a direct and conceptual replication of these earlier findings, including a cross-cultural extension in five countries, to investigate the influences of religious and national cultures on the relevance of immoral thoughts versus behaviors in evaluating the moral status of others. We replicate the original finding that American Protestants (but not Jews) consider immoral thoughts as negatively as actions. We also observe substantial variation across cultures and religions, such that Americans were generally less condemning of immoral thoughts than members of the same religion in other countries. These results provide clues for further theorizing about how both country and religion shape moral judgment.

International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
Jilin University (CN), University of Michigan (US), Brandman University (US), D’Or Institute for Research and Education (BR), Jilin Medical University (CN), University of Southampton (GB), Arizona State University (US), UCLouvain (BE), Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.