The policy instruments and the risk of conflict in rural village energy transition: the case of the coal-to-gas policy in Hebei Province, China

As a typical case of authoritarian environmentalism, China's large-scale energy transition showcases state capacity yet carries under-examined conflict risks. This study examines rural “coal-to-gas” policy implementation, employing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior framework to model farmer-government interactions. Structural equation modeling reveals that farmers' and governments' behavioral intentions significantly positively influence farmers' policy responses, with standardized path coefficients of 0.856 and 0.207 respectively. The energy transition conflict risk index is 0.240, indicating that top-down implementation enhances efficiency but triggers energy justice losses and conflict risks by disregarding farmer preferences. These findings offer theoretical insights for balancing policy effectiveness and social acceptance within authoritarian environmentalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Economics
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2025.2578446
Primary Topic
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The policy instruments and the risk of conflict in rural village energy transition: the case of the coal-to-gas policy in Hebei Province, China

Chenyu Zhao, Tiantian Cui, Yinghui Wang, Chenxi Zhao et al.
Journal of Applied Economics
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
article

The policy instruments and the risk of conflict in rural village energy transition: the case of the coal-to-gas policy in Hebei Province, China

Chenyu Zhao, Tiantian Cui, Yinghui Wang, Chenxi Zhao, Xudong Wei
article en

Abstract

As a typical case of authoritarian environmentalism, China's large-scale energy transition showcases state capacity yet carries under-examined conflict risks. This study examines rural “coal-to-gas” policy implementation, employing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior framework to model farmer-government interactions. Structural equation modeling reveals that farmers' and governments' behavioral intentions significantly positively influence farmers' policy responses, with standardized path coefficients of 0.856 and 0.207 respectively. The energy transition conflict risk index is 0.240, indicating that top-down implementation enhances efficiency but triggers energy justice losses and conflict risks by disregarding farmer preferences. These findings offer theoretical insights for balancing policy effectiveness and social acceptance within authoritarian environmentalism.

Journal of Applied EconomicsVol. 28(1)
Tianjin University of Finance and Economics (CN), Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.