Integrating the In‐Laws: Class and Kin Support Within Marriage in Urban Kenya

ABSTRACT Objective This study compares affinal kin relationships in low‐income and higher‐income families in Nairobi, Kenya. Background In most studies of kinship structure and relationships in sub‐Saharan Africa, culture serves as the basis upon which norms and expectations of kin are differentiated. While important, within the context of increasing economic inequality, it may be that marriage and kinship expectations and practices are also increasingly differentiated by social class, reflecting increasing social stratification in family formation and organization. Method Narrative and thematic analysis were used on qualitative data from 46 in‐depth interviews with 28 low‐income, and 18 middle‐ and high‐income women and men, married or living with a partner, to understand class‐based differences in kin integration by gender. Results Across class, among women, the levels of affinal kin integration varied; among men, those in the low‐income category described very limited affinal‐kin integration due to economic constraints, whereas their higher‐income peers were able to maintain close ties with affinal kin mainly attributable to having advanced in the union formalization process. At the same time, however, higher‐income participants—both men and women—expressed a desire for greater couple‐level autonomy in decision‐making. Conclusion There are emerging class‐based differences in the structure and value of support from and relationships with affinal kin, which, in turn hold important implications for the reproduction of social stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.70039
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating the In‐Laws: Class and Kin Support Within Marriage in Urban Kenya

Kirsten Stoebenau, Estelle Sidze, Sangeetha Madhavan, Nikita Viswasam
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

Integrating the In‐Laws: Class and Kin Support Within Marriage in Urban Kenya

Kirsten Stoebenau, Estelle Sidze, Sangeetha Madhavan, Nikita Viswasam
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective This study compares affinal kin relationships in low‐income and higher‐income families in Nairobi, Kenya. Background In most studies of kinship structure and relationships in sub‐Saharan Africa, culture serves as the basis upon which norms and expectations of kin are differentiated. While important, within the context of increasing economic inequality, it may be that marriage and kinship expectations and practices are also increasingly differentiated by social class, reflecting increasing social stratification in family formation and organization. Method Narrative and thematic analysis were used on qualitative data from 46 in‐depth interviews with 28 low‐income, and 18 middle‐ and high‐income women and men, married or living with a partner, to understand class‐based differences in kin integration by gender. Results Across class, among women, the levels of affinal kin integration varied; among men, those in the low‐income category described very limited affinal‐kin integration due to economic constraints, whereas their higher‐income peers were able to maintain close ties with affinal kin mainly attributable to having advanced in the union formalization process. At the same time, however, higher‐income participants—both men and women—expressed a desire for greater couple‐level autonomy in decision‐making. Conclusion There are emerging class‐based differences in the structure and value of support from and relationships with affinal kin, which, in turn hold important implications for the reproduction of social stratification.

Journal of Marriage and the Family
African Union (ET), African Population and Health Research Center (KE), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.