Episodes in Dutch Policy to Develop ‘Left Behind Places’ (1945–2025)

Abstract This contribution takes Rob Tamsma’s 1972 paper ‘ The Northern Netherlands: Large problem area in a small country, small problem area in a large economic community’ as a starting point to probe the history and literature about Dutch regional development policy since 1945. We do this by relying on economic‐geographic research, much of it published in TESG. We relate how post‐war reconstruction in the 1950s and 1960s brought about a successful comprehensive regional development approach to industrialization. However, when this approach was extended to services in the 1970s, it faltered. We subsequently discuss the shift of regional development policy towards innovative regions in the 1980s and beyond, when the policy gradually lost its comprehensiveness and funding. In conclusion, we assess how historical experiences of Dutch regional development policy could inform policy debates on contemporary spatial‐economic issues and left‐behind places.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.70048
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Regional resilience and development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Episodes in Dutch Policy to Develop ‘Left Behind Places’ (1945–2025)

Michiel van Meeteren, Martijn J. Smit
3 citations
Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
Regional resilience and development
9.39
article

Episodes in Dutch Policy to Develop ‘Left Behind Places’ (1945–2025)

Michiel van Meeteren, Martijn J. Smit
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This contribution takes Rob Tamsma’s 1972 paper ‘ The Northern Netherlands: Large problem area in a small country, small problem area in a large economic community’ as a starting point to probe the history and literature about Dutch regional development policy since 1945. We do this by relying on economic‐geographic research, much of it published in TESG. We relate how post‐war reconstruction in the 1950s and 1960s brought about a successful comprehensive regional development approach to industrialization. However, when this approach was extended to services in the 1970s, it faltered. We subsequently discuss the shift of regional development policy towards innovative regions in the 1980s and beyond, when the policy gradually lost its comprehensiveness and funding. In conclusion, we assess how historical experiences of Dutch regional development policy could inform policy debates on contemporary spatial‐economic issues and left‐behind places.

Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale GeografieVol. 116(5)
University of Humanistic Studies (NL), Utrecht University (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Regional resilience and development
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.