On logical interpretation

The issue of legal interpretation is one of the most important research matters of jurisprudence. In order to be able to apply written legal texts, we need to be able to determine their meaning or possible range of meanings. Perhaps the most interesting method is the so-called logical interpretation, which helps to determine the meaning of legal texts with formulae derived from formal logic, but in fact also containing the evaluation of the person performing the interpretation. The present study reviews the basic characteristics of logical interpretation and then analyzes its different formulae. Its final conclusion is that the so-called logical type of legal interpretation is only a quasi-logical one, and by using different formulae, based on the individual evaluation of the interpreter, the different meanings of the given legal text can also be derived in ways that are all legitimate and can be equally protected in legal practice too.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jogelméleti Szemle
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59558/jesz.2025.3.196
Primary Topic
Legal Language and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On logical interpretation

Zoltán Tóth J.
Jogelméleti Szemle
Legal Language and Interpretation
article

On logical interpretation

Zoltán Tóth J.
article en

Abstract

The issue of legal interpretation is one of the most important research matters of jurisprudence. In order to be able to apply written legal texts, we need to be able to determine their meaning or possible range of meanings. Perhaps the most interesting method is the so-called logical interpretation, which helps to determine the meaning of legal texts with formulae derived from formal logic, but in fact also containing the evaluation of the person performing the interpretation. The present study reviews the basic characteristics of logical interpretation and then analyzes its different formulae. Its final conclusion is that the so-called logical type of legal interpretation is only a quasi-logical one, and by using different formulae, based on the individual evaluation of the interpreter, the different meanings of the given legal text can also be derived in ways that are all legitimate and can be equally protected in legal practice too.

Jogelméleti Szemle(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Legal Language and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.