Clinical Outcomes of Fluid Resuscitation with Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer’s Solution in Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract Sodium bicarbonate Ringer’s (SBR) solution is a novel crystalloid solution that has been demonstrated to improve metabolic acidosis caused by shock. Emerging evidence suggests that SBR could be a more effective therapeutic option in the context of hemorrhagic shock. Hence, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of SBR solution to the traditional crystalloids in hemorrhagic shock patients. We searched on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for all relevant randomized clinical trials. Our review included all studies comparing the clinical outcomes of SBR solution to lactated Ringer’s solution or normal saline in hemorrhagic shock. There were two primary outcomes: mortality and shock-related complications in addition to mean arterial pressure (MAP). Data were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager Software (RevMan version 5.4). Our analysis included three studies that compared SBR to normal saline or lactated Ringer’s. No significant effect was observed for the intervention neither on MAP (mean difference [MD] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] [ −0.91, 3.08], P = 0.49) nor the mortality (relative risk [RR] = 0.61, 95% CI [0.36, 1.05], P = 0.83). For adverse events, a significant difference was observed for acute respiratory distress syndrome and multi-organ failure, with RR values of −0.13 and 0.38, respectively. Additionally, the SBR group had significantly decreased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (MD = −1.43, 95% CI [−2.07, −0.79], P > 0.00001). No observed effect was found on hospitalization days or developing disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. SBR is safe and effective for hemorrhagic shock resuscitation and has better outcomes in terms of ICU length of stay and hospitalization days with less complications. However, it has similar outcomes compared to the lactated Ringer’s and normal saline regarding the mortality and MAP. Further studies are needed with larger sample size to assess the long-term follow-up and side effects. Prospero registered on October 8 with ID CRD42023467595.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAP Academy Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/japaj.japaj_8_24
Primary Topic
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes of Fluid Resuscitation with Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer’s Solution in Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A. Ellaithy, Taha Nagib, Mohamed E. El-Sharkawi, Hossam H Yussef et al.
JAP Academy Journal
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
article

Clinical Outcomes of Fluid Resuscitation with Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer’s Solution in Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A. Ellaithy, Taha Nagib, Mohamed E. El-Sharkawi, Hossam H Yussef, Sakhr Alshwayyat, Nihad A. Almasri, Ahmed Ibraheem, Mohammad Hamad, Bushra Al-Shaikh, Ibrahim Ellaithy, Ahmed Elhobi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sodium bicarbonate Ringer’s (SBR) solution is a novel crystalloid solution that has been demonstrated to improve metabolic acidosis caused by shock. Emerging evidence suggests that SBR could be a more effective therapeutic option in the context of hemorrhagic shock. Hence, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of SBR solution to the traditional crystalloids in hemorrhagic shock patients. We searched on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for all relevant randomized clinical trials. Our review included all studies comparing the clinical outcomes of SBR solution to lactated Ringer’s solution or normal saline in hemorrhagic shock. There were two primary outcomes: mortality and shock-related complications in addition to mean arterial pressure (MAP). Data were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager Software (RevMan version 5.4). Our analysis included three studies that compared SBR to normal saline or lactated Ringer’s. No significant effect was observed for the intervention neither on MAP (mean difference [MD] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] [ −0.91, 3.08], P = 0.49) nor the mortality (relative risk [RR] = 0.61, 95% CI [0.36, 1.05], P = 0.83). For adverse events, a significant difference was observed for acute respiratory distress syndrome and multi-organ failure, with RR values of −0.13 and 0.38, respectively. Additionally, the SBR group had significantly decreased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (MD = −1.43, 95% CI [−2.07, −0.79], P > 0.00001). No observed effect was found on hospitalization days or developing disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. SBR is safe and effective for hemorrhagic shock resuscitation and has better outcomes in terms of ICU length of stay and hospitalization days with less complications. However, it has similar outcomes compared to the lactated Ringer’s and normal saline regarding the mortality and MAP. Further studies are needed with larger sample size to assess the long-term follow-up and side effects. Prospero registered on October 8 with ID CRD42023467595.

JAP Academy JournalVol. 3(2)
Suez Canal University (EG), University of Jordan (JO), Cairo University (EG), Applied Science Private University (JO), Sana'a University (YE), University of Tripoli (LY), King Hussein Cancer Center (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.