The Use of Sternum and Sacrum Angles in the Assessment of Sitting Posture in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Cohorts Assessed Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic

<b>Background</b>: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with increased sedentary behavior in children, raising concerns about posture and spinal health. This study compared standardized measures of sitting spinal alignment in two independent cohorts assessed before (2017) and after (2024) the pandemic and examined correlations among alignment parameters across different sitting postures. <b>Methods</b>: This cross-sectional study included healthy children aged 9-13 years. The sternal angle, sacral angle, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, trunk tilt, and lateral deviation were measured using a Saunders digital inclinometer and a DIERS Formetric 4D rasterstereographic system in passive, forced, and corrected sitting postures. <b>Results</b>: No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2017 and 2024 cohorts (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Within each cohort, significant posture-related differences were found for the sternal and sacral angles, lumbar lordosis, and lateral deviation (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while thoracic kyphosis and trunk inclination differed between passive and corrected sitting (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The sternal angle correlated moderately to strongly with thoracic kyphosis (<i>r</i> = 0.657-0.695, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the sacral angle correlated with lumbar lordosis (<i>r</i> = 0.679-0.743, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Similar alignment parameters across time-separated cohorts suggest no major cohort-level shifts in standardized sitting posture; however, behavioral factors were not directly assessed. Strong correlations among sagittal angles emphasize the consistent geometric relationship between the sternum, sacrum, and spinal curvatures. A sternal angle of approximately 65° was consistently associated with physiologically favorable spinal alignment and may serve as a practical reference value for posture assessment and education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children12111547
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of Sternum and Sacrum Angles in the Assessment of Sitting Posture in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Cohorts Assessed Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic

Arkadiusz Żurawski, Sun-Young Ha, Wojciech Kiebzak
1 citations
Children
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
2.01
article

The Use of Sternum and Sacrum Angles in the Assessment of Sitting Posture in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Cohorts Assessed Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic

Arkadiusz Żurawski, Sun-Young Ha, Wojciech Kiebzak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with increased sedentary behavior in children, raising concerns about posture and spinal health. This study compared standardized measures of sitting spinal alignment in two independent cohorts assessed before (2017) and after (2024) the pandemic and examined correlations among alignment parameters across different sitting postures. <b>Methods</b>: This cross-sectional study included healthy children aged 9-13 years. The sternal angle, sacral angle, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, trunk tilt, and lateral deviation were measured using a Saunders digital inclinometer and a DIERS Formetric 4D rasterstereographic system in passive, forced, and corrected sitting postures. <b>Results</b>: No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2017 and 2024 cohorts (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Within each cohort, significant posture-related differences were found for the sternal and sacral angles, lumbar lordosis, and lateral deviation (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while thoracic kyphosis and trunk inclination differed between passive and corrected sitting (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The sternal angle correlated moderately to strongly with thoracic kyphosis (<i>r</i> = 0.657-0.695, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the sacral angle correlated with lumbar lordosis (<i>r</i> = 0.679-0.743, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Similar alignment parameters across time-separated cohorts suggest no major cohort-level shifts in standardized sitting posture; however, behavioral factors were not directly assessed. Strong correlations among sagittal angles emphasize the consistent geometric relationship between the sternum, sacrum, and spinal curvatures. A sternal angle of approximately 65° was consistently associated with physiologically favorable spinal alignment and may serve as a practical reference value for posture assessment and education.

ChildrenVol. 12(11)
Jan Kochanowski University (PL), Kyungnam University (KR)
Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.