Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain and Recovery After Robotic Prostate Adenomectomy: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Effective perioperative pain management remains a key goal of enhanced recovery protocols, especially in minimally invasive urologic surgery, where optimizing comfort while limiting opioid exposure is essential. Intravenous lidocaine has gained attention for its multimodal analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, yet evidence in robotic prostatectomy remains limited. This study evaluated whether intraoperative lidocaine infusion was associated with lower early postoperative pain scores and reduced opioid use in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A retrospective, single-center analysis was conducted at Pelican Clinical Hospital, Oradea, Romania, including 112 patients operated on between January 2020 and December 2023. All procedures were performed by the same surgical and anesthetic teams using standardized ERAS-based protocols. Patients were divided into two groups: the Lidocaine Group (LG, <i>n</i> = 51), who received a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h during surgery, and the Control Group (CG, <i>n</i> = 61), who received standard anesthesia without lidocaine. Postoperative pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 0, 4, 12, and 24 h, and opioid use was converted into morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included time to ambulation, gastrointestinal recovery, oral intake, hospital stay, and complications. <i>Results</i>: Pain intensity was significantly lower in the lidocaine group at 4 h postoperatively (VAS 3.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.3 ± 1.3; <i>p</i> = 0.01), with similar scores later. Total opioid use was reduced by about 18% in the lidocaine group (25.7 ± 9.4 vs. 31.2 ± 10.5 MME; <i>p</i> = 0.03). Recovery parameters and complication rates were comparable between groups, and no lidocaine-related adverse events were recorded. <i>Conclusions</i>: Intraoperative intravenous lidocaine was associated with lower early postoperative pain scores and reduced opioid requirements after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy without affecting recovery or safety. Its favorable profile and low cost support its inclusion as a practical adjunct in multimodal analgesia within ERAS pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61112045
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain and Recovery After Robotic Prostate Adenomectomy: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Ahmed Abu-Awwad, Simona-Alina Abu-Awwad, Mihai Botea, Erika Bimbó-Szuhai et al.
1 citations
Medicina
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
article

Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain and Recovery After Robotic Prostate Adenomectomy: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Ahmed Abu-Awwad, Simona-Alina Abu-Awwad, Mihai Botea, Erika Bimbó-Szuhai, Anca M. Bînă, Mihaela Gabriela Bontea, Carmen-Ioana Marta, Georgiana Maria Popa, Adrian Gheorghe Osiceanu, Ciprian Dumitru Puscas, Cristian Mihai Moisa Cezar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Effective perioperative pain management remains a key goal of enhanced recovery protocols, especially in minimally invasive urologic surgery, where optimizing comfort while limiting opioid exposure is essential. Intravenous lidocaine has gained attention for its multimodal analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, yet evidence in robotic prostatectomy remains limited. This study evaluated whether intraoperative lidocaine infusion was associated with lower early postoperative pain scores and reduced opioid use in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A retrospective, single-center analysis was conducted at Pelican Clinical Hospital, Oradea, Romania, including 112 patients operated on between January 2020 and December 2023. All procedures were performed by the same surgical and anesthetic teams using standardized ERAS-based protocols. Patients were divided into two groups: the Lidocaine Group (LG, <i>n</i> = 51), who received a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h during surgery, and the Control Group (CG, <i>n</i> = 61), who received standard anesthesia without lidocaine. Postoperative pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 0, 4, 12, and 24 h, and opioid use was converted into morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included time to ambulation, gastrointestinal recovery, oral intake, hospital stay, and complications. <i>Results</i>: Pain intensity was significantly lower in the lidocaine group at 4 h postoperatively (VAS 3.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.3 ± 1.3; <i>p</i> = 0.01), with similar scores later. Total opioid use was reduced by about 18% in the lidocaine group (25.7 ± 9.4 vs. 31.2 ± 10.5 MME; <i>p</i> = 0.03). Recovery parameters and complication rates were comparable between groups, and no lidocaine-related adverse events were recorded. <i>Conclusions</i>: Intraoperative intravenous lidocaine was associated with lower early postoperative pain scores and reduced opioid requirements after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy without affecting recovery or safety. Its favorable profile and low cost support its inclusion as a practical adjunct in multimodal analgesia within ERAS pathways.

MedicinaVol. 61(11)
University of Oradea (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.