Trust in scientists and doctors: The roles of faith, politics, education and gender

This article examines trust in science in England, focusing on variation across demographic and ideological groups. Using survey data from 11,173 respondents, we compare trust in two domains, medical doctors and scientists, to explore whether predictors operate similarly across these professional groups. We find higher education is associated with greater trust, while right-wing political orientation predicts lower trust. Religious affiliation also matters, with some faith groups reporting lower trust relative to the non-religious baseline. Gender differences emerge as well, particularly in trust in medical doctors. Respondents selecting 'Prefer not to say' on the religion item report significantly lower trust in both doctors and scientists, consistent with a broader privacy-motivated disclosure style. Our results highlight the importance of considering not just overall levels of trust in science, but variation across education, ideology, religion and gender, and they suggest that trust in doctors and trust in scientists, while related, are not interchangeable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Understanding of Science
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251386562
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust in scientists and doctors: The roles of faith, politics, education and gender

Martin Ejnar Hansen, Jason Reifler, Han Dorussen, Dorothy Yen et al.
Public Understanding of Science
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Trust in scientists and doctors: The roles of faith, politics, education and gender

Martin Ejnar Hansen, Jason Reifler, Han Dorussen, Dorothy Yen, Thomas J. Scotto, Yosuke Sunahara, Steve Pickering
article en

Abstract

This article examines trust in science in England, focusing on variation across demographic and ideological groups. Using survey data from 11,173 respondents, we compare trust in two domains, medical doctors and scientists, to explore whether predictors operate similarly across these professional groups. We find higher education is associated with greater trust, while right-wing political orientation predicts lower trust. Religious affiliation also matters, with some faith groups reporting lower trust relative to the non-religious baseline. Gender differences emerge as well, particularly in trust in medical doctors. Respondents selecting 'Prefer not to say' on the religion item report significantly lower trust in both doctors and scientists, consistent with a broader privacy-motivated disclosure style. Our results highlight the importance of considering not just overall levels of trust in science, but variation across education, ideology, religion and gender, and they suggest that trust in doctors and trust in scientists, while related, are not interchangeable.

Public Understanding of Science
University of Essex (GB), University of Strathclyde (GB), University of Southampton (GB), Brunel University of London (GB), Kobe University (JP), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trust in scientists and doctors: The roles of faith, politics, education and gender — Martin Ejnar Hansen, Jason Reifler, et al. · Public Understanding of Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS