Prognostic Impact of Body Mass index in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IntroductionBody mass index (BMI) is a common clinical parameter associated with cancer prognosis, but its association with survival outcomes in lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic value of BMI in ICI-treated lung cancer patients.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on online databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to December 1, 2024. Eligible studies included lung cancer patients treated with ICIs and reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by BMI. Random-effects models were used to determine HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsA total of 30 studies involving 5987 patients were included. High BMI was significantly associated with better OS (HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.60-0.80) and PFS (HR = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.72-0.93). The subgroup analysis showed improved survival outcomes particularly in patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> as compared with others. However, this association was not statistically significant in small-cell lung cancer.ConclusionHigh BMI was associated with a better prognosis than low BMI in ICI-treated patients with lung cancer. Due to study limitations, the prognostic impact of BMI still requires further clarification with additional evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338251394573
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Impact of Body Mass index in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mingyang Tao, Xuebing Yan, Jingxian Mao, Yanlin Zhao et al.
1 citations
PubMed
Cancer Risks and Factors
1.05
article

Prognostic Impact of Body Mass index in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mingyang Tao, Xuebing Yan, Jingxian Mao, Yanlin Zhao, H. J. Yang, Zhe Wang, Mengxue Yang, Zhu Guo-hui, Jiaxin Wang, Huaijuan Guo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

IntroductionBody mass index (BMI) is a common clinical parameter associated with cancer prognosis, but its association with survival outcomes in lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic value of BMI in ICI-treated lung cancer patients.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on online databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to December 1, 2024. Eligible studies included lung cancer patients treated with ICIs and reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by BMI. Random-effects models were used to determine HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsA total of 30 studies involving 5987 patients were included. High BMI was significantly associated with better OS (HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.60-0.80) and PFS (HR = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.72-0.93). The subgroup analysis showed improved survival outcomes particularly in patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> as compared with others. However, this association was not statistically significant in small-cell lung cancer.ConclusionHigh BMI was associated with a better prognosis than low BMI in ICI-treated patients with lung cancer. Due to study limitations, the prognostic impact of BMI still requires further clarification with additional evidence.

PubMedVol. 24
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN), Yangzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cancer Risks and Factors
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.