When the air feels heavy: How visceral stuffiness shifts well-being priorities

When the air feels heavy and breathing becomes strained, the resulting visceral state may cause our motivational compass to quietly tilt. This study investigates whether the experience of visceral stuffiness can temporarily recalibrate individuals' well-being priorities by increasing the salience of hedonic (pleasure-oriented) over eudaimonic (meaning-oriented) motivation and whether this motivational shift is reflected in subsequent decisions involving a trade-off between hedonic enjoyment and meaningful engagement. The results (N = 296) indicate that greater feelings of stuffiness were associated with stronger momentary preferences for happiness over meaning, suggesting that even mild bodily discomfort can influence well-being motivation. However, this shift in priorities did not consistently carry over to downstream choices, revealing a potential dissociation between what individuals value in the moment and what they ultimately decide. These findings highlight how subtle visceral states can shape how people navigate the happiness-meaning dilemma by temporarily altering the psychological weight of each ideal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105953
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When the air feels heavy: How visceral stuffiness shifts well-being priorities

Shinjung Kim
Acta Psychologica
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

When the air feels heavy: How visceral stuffiness shifts well-being priorities

Shinjung Kim
article en

Abstract

When the air feels heavy and breathing becomes strained, the resulting visceral state may cause our motivational compass to quietly tilt. This study investigates whether the experience of visceral stuffiness can temporarily recalibrate individuals' well-being priorities by increasing the salience of hedonic (pleasure-oriented) over eudaimonic (meaning-oriented) motivation and whether this motivational shift is reflected in subsequent decisions involving a trade-off between hedonic enjoyment and meaningful engagement. The results (N = 296) indicate that greater feelings of stuffiness were associated with stronger momentary preferences for happiness over meaning, suggesting that even mild bodily discomfort can influence well-being motivation. However, this shift in priorities did not consistently carry over to downstream choices, revealing a potential dissociation between what individuals value in the moment and what they ultimately decide. These findings highlight how subtle visceral states can shape how people navigate the happiness-meaning dilemma by temporarily altering the psychological weight of each ideal.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 261
Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.