REMIND-PyPSA-Eur: integrating power system flexibility into sector-coupled energy transition pathways
Abstract The rapid expansion of low-cost renewable electricity combined with end-use electrification in transport, industry, and buildings offers a promising path to deep decarbonisation. However, aligning variable supply with demand requires strategies for daily and seasonal balancing. Existing models either lack the wide scope required for long-term transition pathways or the spatio-temporal detail to capture power system variability and flexibility. Here, we combine the complementary strengths of REMIND, a long-term integrated assessment model, and PyPSA-Eur, an hourly energy system model, through a bi-directional, price-based and iterative soft coupling. REMIND provides pathway variables such as sectoral electricity demand, installed capacities, and costs to PyPSA-Eur, which returns optimised operational variables such as capacity factors, storage requirements, and relative prices. After sufficient convergence, this integrated approach jointly optimises long-term investment and short-term operation. We demonstrate the coupling for two Germany-focused scenarios, with and without demand-side flexibility, reaching climate neutrality by 2045. Our results confirm that a sector-coupled energy system with nearly 100% renewable electricity is technically possible and economically viable. Power system flexibility influences long-term pathways through price differentiation: supply-side market values vary by generation technology, while demand-side prices vary by end-use sector. Flexible electrolysers and smart-charging electric vehicles benefit from below-average prices, whereas less flexible heat pumps face almost twice the average price due to winter peak loads. Without demand-side flexibility, electricity prices increase across all end-users, though battery deployment partially compensates. By integrating hourly power system dynamics into multi-decadal energy transition pathways, our approach addresses the fundamental trade-off between the wide scope needed for climate policy analysis and the spatio-temporal detail needed for power system planning.
Authors
- Gunnar Luderer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-6155)
- I. Ramírez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1268-0077)
- Robin Hasse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1818-3186)
- Adrian Odenweller
- Tom Brown (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5898-1911)
- Chen Chris Gong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6406-6266)
- Falko Ueckerdt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5585-030X)
- Felix Schreyer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0376-2599)
- Johannes Hampp
- Jarusch Muessel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1857-7866)
- Robert Pietzcker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9403-6711)
Institutions
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- University of Bayreuth (DE)
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Progress in Energy
- Published
- 2026-01-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/ae3ffe
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 21.93