Impact of filter type on filtered drag modeling: <i>A priori</i> analysis and coarse-grid simulation assessment

Despite their critical role, filter selection for drag modeling lacks systematic analysis and physics-informed guidance, leading to inconsistent choices and poorly understood impacts on model accuracy. This study systematically investigates the impact of filter type on the development and predictive accuracy of filtered drag models in gas–solid fluidized beds. Through a priori analysis of six representative filters, their ability to preserve mesoscale heterogeneities and maintain directional robustness was investigated. Coarse-grid simulations of bubbling and turbulent fluidized beds, spanning diverse particle properties and scales, reveal significant discrepancies in model performance. Maximum differences in mean absolute percentage error for solid volume fraction reach 52.6% (axial) and 31.5% (radial). Results indicate that Gaussian filters provide superior directional robustness and predictive accuracy, making them a preferable alternative to Box filters. This work offers practical guidance on filter selection for developing reliable filtered drag models and improving the accuracy of large-scale fluidized bed simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0302178
Primary Topic
Granular flow and fluidized beds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of filter type on filtered drag modeling: A priori analysis and coarse-grid simulation assessment

Yi Yang, Xi Gao, Chunyu Zheng, Jianjian Dai et al.
Physics of Fluids
Granular flow and fluidized beds
article

Impact of filter type on filtered drag modeling: A priori analysis and coarse-grid simulation assessment

Yi Yang, Xi Gao, Chunyu Zheng, Jianjian Dai, Youwei Cheng, Zhuohan Li, Chuan Qin, Lijun Wang, Jiahui Zhang, Hairui Lin
article en

Abstract

Despite their critical role, filter selection for drag modeling lacks systematic analysis and physics-informed guidance, leading to inconsistent choices and poorly understood impacts on model accuracy. This study systematically investigates the impact of filter type on the development and predictive accuracy of filtered drag models in gas–solid fluidized beds. Through a priori analysis of six representative filters, their ability to preserve mesoscale heterogeneities and maintain directional robustness was investigated. Coarse-grid simulations of bubbling and turbulent fluidized beds, spanning diverse particle properties and scales, reveal significant discrepancies in model performance. Maximum differences in mean absolute percentage error for solid volume fraction reach 52.6% (axial) and 31.5% (radial). Results indicate that Gaussian filters provide superior directional robustness and predictive accuracy, making them a preferable alternative to Box filters. This work offers practical guidance on filter selection for developing reliable filtered drag models and improving the accuracy of large-scale fluidized bed simulations.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(11)
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Granular flow and fluidized beds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.