Perceptual assessment of simulated aircraft cabin noise in early design stages

This study explores the potential of simulation methodologies in the early stages of the acoustic design of advanced air mobility cabins. With perceptual assessment as a priority, the approach includes conducting listening experiments based on the auralization of simulation results. For this, a cabin was simulated under the stochastic load of a turbulent boundary layer and auralized as representative cabin noise. The listening experiments investigated the impact of cabin parameter variations-specifically Young's modulus, skin thickness, and fluid bulk modulus-on the participants' perception and preferences. The findings show that utilizing the presented methodology within an early design scope produced audible differences for these parameter variations. With significant changes to the signals' preference probabilities, the proposed method is able to provide a better understanding and statistical depth to the cabin acoustic design process. Loudness and A-weighted sound pressure levels reliably predicted preferences, whereas other psychoacoustic metrics were of little significance, mainly due to the stochastic, stationary, and low-frequency characteristics of the noise samples. Furthermore, the position of the passenger within the cabin model significantly affected the preferences. Adding authentic cabin sounds to the auralizations did not significantly alter the parameter variations' preference distributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0039865
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptual assessment of simulated aircraft cabin noise in early design stages

Don Knuth, Roberto Merino-Martínez, Sabine Langer, Yannik Hüpel et al.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Noise Effects and Management
article

Perceptual assessment of simulated aircraft cabin noise in early design stages

Don Knuth, Roberto Merino-Martínez, Sabine Langer, Yannik Hüpel, Josephine S. Pockelé
article en

Abstract

This study explores the potential of simulation methodologies in the early stages of the acoustic design of advanced air mobility cabins. With perceptual assessment as a priority, the approach includes conducting listening experiments based on the auralization of simulation results. For this, a cabin was simulated under the stochastic load of a turbulent boundary layer and auralized as representative cabin noise. The listening experiments investigated the impact of cabin parameter variations-specifically Young's modulus, skin thickness, and fluid bulk modulus-on the participants' perception and preferences. The findings show that utilizing the presented methodology within an early design scope produced audible differences for these parameter variations. With significant changes to the signals' preference probabilities, the proposed method is able to provide a better understanding and statistical depth to the cabin acoustic design process. Loudness and A-weighted sound pressure levels reliably predicted preferences, whereas other psychoacoustic metrics were of little significance, mainly due to the stochastic, stationary, and low-frequency characteristics of the noise samples. Furthermore, the position of the passenger within the cabin model significantly affected the preferences. Adding authentic cabin sounds to the auralizations did not significantly alter the parameter variations' preference distributions.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 158(5)
Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.