How Scratch-and-Sniff Books Encode Smell Across Development

Scratch-and-sniff books combine olfactory cues with textual and visual narratives thus offering multisensory reading experiences. Despite their popularity since their emergence in the 1970s, these books have received little scholarly attention, particularly regarding their cognitive and developmental relevance. This paper presents a mixed-methods analysis of 334 scratch-and-sniff books, investigating how smell content varies by target age, conceptual complexity, and linguistic framing. Quantitative analyses reveal systematic differences in smell types, labelling strategies, and descriptive complexity depending on target readership age. Books targeted at younger readers tend to feature simple, explicitly labelled smells (e.g., "apple", "chocolate"), while those books targeting an older audience rely more on implicit references, humour, and/or socially transgressive smells (e.g., "fart", "smelly feet"). Qualitative readings show how olfactory cues are embedded in broader narrative structures that support inferencing, emotional resonance, and social norm acquisition. We argue that scratch-and-sniff books may be designed to use smell not only with the intention to entertain, but also to prompt crossmodal mapping, encourage inferential reasoning, and scaffold early engagements with sensory and social meaning. These findings indicate that scratch-and-sniff books systematically adapt their olfactory content and linguistic framing to developmental stages, suggesting that smell may serve not only to entertain, but also to scaffold emerging sensory, cognitive, and social capacities in early reading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multisensory Research
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10176
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Scratch-and-Sniff Books Encode Smell Across Development

Charles J. Spence, Natalia Ingebretsen Kucirkova, Jas Brooks
Multisensory Research
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
article

How Scratch-and-Sniff Books Encode Smell Across Development

Charles J. Spence, Natalia Ingebretsen Kucirkova, Jas Brooks
article en

Abstract

Scratch-and-sniff books combine olfactory cues with textual and visual narratives thus offering multisensory reading experiences. Despite their popularity since their emergence in the 1970s, these books have received little scholarly attention, particularly regarding their cognitive and developmental relevance. This paper presents a mixed-methods analysis of 334 scratch-and-sniff books, investigating how smell content varies by target age, conceptual complexity, and linguistic framing. Quantitative analyses reveal systematic differences in smell types, labelling strategies, and descriptive complexity depending on target readership age. Books targeted at younger readers tend to feature simple, explicitly labelled smells (e.g., "apple", "chocolate"), while those books targeting an older audience rely more on implicit references, humour, and/or socially transgressive smells (e.g., "fart", "smelly feet"). Qualitative readings show how olfactory cues are embedded in broader narrative structures that support inferencing, emotional resonance, and social norm acquisition. We argue that scratch-and-sniff books may be designed to use smell not only with the intention to entertain, but also to prompt crossmodal mapping, encourage inferential reasoning, and scaffold early engagements with sensory and social meaning. These findings indicate that scratch-and-sniff books systematically adapt their olfactory content and linguistic framing to developmental stages, suggesting that smell may serve not only to entertain, but also to scaffold emerging sensory, cognitive, and social capacities in early reading.

Multisensory ResearchVol. 38(6-8)
The Open University (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), University of Stavanger (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.