Managing cascading effects – Regional water sustainability from a crisis management perspective

Cascading effects of water stress - understood as sequential failures in interdependent natural, infrastructural, and institutional systems - increasingly challenge crisis management, particularly amid intensifying droughts and growing demand for water-intensive emergency operations. Despite rising awareness of sustainable water management, a disconnect persists between sustainability principles and their application in emergency settings - where actions may unintentionally trigger or exacerbate cascading effects. To explore this, an exploratory survey of 44 German civil protection practitioners was conducted. Participants (e.g., fire brigade, ambulance service, Federal Agency for Technical Relief (THW)) were selected for their decision-making authority in water-intensive operations such as firefighting or emergency water treatment. The study assessed awareness of cascading effects and examined current approaches to manage water-intensive operations. It focused on perceptions of the water-emergency operations interplay, types of information used in decisions (e.g., real-time GIS data), and systemic barriers to sustainable management. Findings show that sustainable water use is only marginally considered in civil protection. Standard procedures for integrating long-term recovery or water resource considerations are mostly lacking, and coordination across responsible institutions is fragmented. Tools to predict cascading effects or to support sustainable decisions under time pressure are also insufficient Nonetheless, respondents showed general awareness of the issue’s relevance. They emphasized that raising awareness and improving coordination are key first steps toward more sustainable operational response strategies. These could contribute to developing a Water Governance Framework where civil protection is recognized as a significant water demanding sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-11-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105899
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing cascading effects – Regional water sustainability from a crisis management perspective

Danielle Carbon, Till Wenzel
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Managing cascading effects – Regional water sustainability from a crisis management perspective

Danielle Carbon, Till Wenzel
article en

Abstract

Cascading effects of water stress - understood as sequential failures in interdependent natural, infrastructural, and institutional systems - increasingly challenge crisis management, particularly amid intensifying droughts and growing demand for water-intensive emergency operations. Despite rising awareness of sustainable water management, a disconnect persists between sustainability principles and their application in emergency settings - where actions may unintentionally trigger or exacerbate cascading effects. To explore this, an exploratory survey of 44 German civil protection practitioners was conducted. Participants (e.g., fire brigade, ambulance service, Federal Agency for Technical Relief (THW)) were selected for their decision-making authority in water-intensive operations such as firefighting or emergency water treatment. The study assessed awareness of cascading effects and examined current approaches to manage water-intensive operations. It focused on perceptions of the water-emergency operations interplay, types of information used in decisions (e.g., real-time GIS data), and systemic barriers to sustainable management. Findings show that sustainable water use is only marginally considered in civil protection. Standard procedures for integrating long-term recovery or water resource considerations are mostly lacking, and coordination across responsible institutions is fragmented. Tools to predict cascading effects or to support sustainable decisions under time pressure are also insufficient Nonetheless, respondents showed general awareness of the issue’s relevance. They emphasized that raising awareness and improving coordination are key first steps toward more sustainable operational response strategies. These could contribute to developing a Water Governance Framework where civil protection is recognized as a significant water demanding sector.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 131
University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.