Approaches to frozen embryo transfer: a Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS) guideline

<h2>Abstract</h2> This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations drawn exclusively from recent randomized control trials, for the clinical management of frozen embryo transfer (FET). In Canada, the incidence of freeze all cycles has increased from 24% to 78% over the last decade. While a freeze all strategy can be a pivotal tool for the prevention of ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS), the available data do not support its routine use for improving live birth rates (LBR), reducing pregnancy loss (PL), or enhancing obstetric outcomes in the general IVF population. Similarly, ovulatory FET cycles do not offer advantages over artificial FET cycles for live birth or pregnancy loss, and current evidence remains conflicting for obstetric and perinatal outcomes. The route of progesterone administration in artificial FET cycles does not significantly affect live birth or pregnancy loss rates. FET approaches should be individualized based on patient characteristics and clinical context, and further research is necessary to optimize outcomes and inform best practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105373
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Approaches to frozen embryo transfer: a Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS) guideline

Sony Sierra, Jason Min, Heather Shapiro, Maria P. Vélez et al.
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Ovarian function and disorders
article

Approaches to frozen embryo transfer: a Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS) guideline

Sony Sierra, Jason Min, Heather Shapiro, Maria P. Vélez, Camille Sylvestre, Neal Mahutte, Kimberly Liu, William Buckett, Elias M. Dahdouh, Julio Saumet, Jeff Roberts
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2> This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations drawn exclusively from recent randomized control trials, for the clinical management of frozen embryo transfer (FET). In Canada, the incidence of freeze all cycles has increased from 24% to 78% over the last decade. While a freeze all strategy can be a pivotal tool for the prevention of ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS), the available data do not support its routine use for improving live birth rates (LBR), reducing pregnancy loss (PL), or enhancing obstetric outcomes in the general IVF population. Similarly, ovulatory FET cycles do not offer advantages over artificial FET cycles for live birth or pregnancy loss, and current evidence remains conflicting for obstetric and perinatal outcomes. The route of progesterone administration in artificial FET cycles does not significantly affect live birth or pregnancy loss rates. FET approaches should be individualized based on patient characteristics and clinical context, and further research is necessary to optimize outcomes and inform best practices.

Reproductive BioMedicine Online
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA), Pacific Centre for Reproductive Medicine (CA), Ottawa Fertility Centre (CA), Sinai Health System (CA), CReATe Fertility Centre (CA), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Ovarian function and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.