Growth and flexibility at the margins? The voluntary sector and civil society in post-welfare Portland

In this article, we shed light on the growth and flexibility of the voluntary sector as it responds to the housing crisis in American cities. To do so, we adopt a perspective from the margins of the post-welfare city (using governmentality studies), focusing on obscure grassroots actors at the interface of the state, the voluntary sector and civil society. Based on fieldwork carried out in Portland, Oregon (USA), this article analyzes city code changes and incentives as government technologies, to shed light on how civil society and voluntary organizations operating at the margins are made responsible for providing resources and participating in the response to homelessness, while simultaneously having their practices subjected to control. We argue that, far from being excluded, some organizations at the margins are selected by the state for inclusion in the voluntary sector, while others remain at the margins as a way to delegitimize their own interventions and the way they provide services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Studies
Published
2025-11-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251390306
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Growth and flexibility at the margins? The voluntary sector and civil society in post-welfare Portland

Geoffrey DeVerteuil, Antonin Margier
1 citations
Urban Studies
Urban Planning and Governance
6.18
article

Growth and flexibility at the margins? The voluntary sector and civil society in post-welfare Portland

Geoffrey DeVerteuil, Antonin Margier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, we shed light on the growth and flexibility of the voluntary sector as it responds to the housing crisis in American cities. To do so, we adopt a perspective from the margins of the post-welfare city (using governmentality studies), focusing on obscure grassroots actors at the interface of the state, the voluntary sector and civil society. Based on fieldwork carried out in Portland, Oregon (USA), this article analyzes city code changes and incentives as government technologies, to shed light on how civil society and voluntary organizations operating at the margins are made responsible for providing resources and participating in the response to homelessness, while simultaneously having their practices subjected to control. We argue that, far from being excluded, some organizations at the margins are selected by the state for inclusion in the voluntary sector, while others remain at the margins as a way to delegitimize their own interventions and the way they provide services.

Urban Studies
CRC for Spatial information (AU), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Planning and Governance
6.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.