Distributing ethical responsibility in hybrid human–AI systems: a conceptual framework and evaluation model

Purpose This paper aims to introduce a conceptual and diagnostic model. This model evaluates how ethical responsibility is distributed in hybrid human–AI systems operating in high-stakes domains. Design/methodology/approach This study develops a multi-dimensional framework of responsibility and proposes the ethical responsibility distribution evaluation model (ERDEM). It is drawn on science and technology studies (STS), postphenomenology and ethics of care. The framework outlines three responsibility dimensions: agency attribution, responsibility types and interaction modes. ERDEM evaluates ethical design based on five criteria – transparency, accountability, fairness, role clarity and human control. Findings This paper identifies four system configurations that shape responsibility flows in hybrid arrangements. It demonstrates the practical value of ERDEM by illustrative cases. It shows how system design and institutional settings influence moral clarity and blame attribution. Research limitations/implications This study shifts attention from individual blame to systemic responsibility. It contributes to emerging theories in AI governance. These include design ethics and relational agency. Practical implications ERDEM gives system designers and regulators a structured way to assess ethical robustness. It turns abstract principles into practical criteria. The framework also guides the development of governance practices that remain sensitive to responsibility. It provides a structured method to assess ethical robustness in AI-supported decisions. It also supports the development of responsibility-sensitive AI governance practices. Originality/value This study advances the debate on AI responsibility. The focus shifts from individual culpability to distributed responsibility across socio-technical systems. Such responsibility is designable and embedded within socio-technical systems. It contributes to a novel conceptual model and actionable tool for ethics-by-design in hybrid decision-making contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Published
2025-11-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-07-2025-0174
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distributing ethical responsibility in hybrid human–AI systems: a conceptual framework and evaluation model

K Hemachandran, Dinesh Kumar, Raul V. Rodriguez, Nidhi Suthar
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Distributing ethical responsibility in hybrid human–AI systems: a conceptual framework and evaluation model

K Hemachandran, Dinesh Kumar, Raul V. Rodriguez, Nidhi Suthar
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to introduce a conceptual and diagnostic model. This model evaluates how ethical responsibility is distributed in hybrid human–AI systems operating in high-stakes domains. Design/methodology/approach This study develops a multi-dimensional framework of responsibility and proposes the ethical responsibility distribution evaluation model (ERDEM). It is drawn on science and technology studies (STS), postphenomenology and ethics of care. The framework outlines three responsibility dimensions: agency attribution, responsibility types and interaction modes. ERDEM evaluates ethical design based on five criteria – transparency, accountability, fairness, role clarity and human control. Findings This paper identifies four system configurations that shape responsibility flows in hybrid arrangements. It demonstrates the practical value of ERDEM by illustrative cases. It shows how system design and institutional settings influence moral clarity and blame attribution. Research limitations/implications This study shifts attention from individual blame to systemic responsibility. It contributes to emerging theories in AI governance. These include design ethics and relational agency. Practical implications ERDEM gives system designers and regulators a structured way to assess ethical robustness. It turns abstract principles into practical criteria. The framework also guides the development of governance practices that remain sensitive to responsibility. It provides a structured method to assess ethical robustness in AI-supported decisions. It also supports the development of responsibility-sensitive AI governance practices. Originality/value This study advances the debate on AI responsibility. The focus shifts from individual culpability to distributed responsibility across socio-technical systems. Such responsibility is designable and embedded within socio-technical systems. It contributes to a novel conceptual model and actionable tool for ethics-by-design in hybrid decision-making contexts.

Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Woxsen School of Business (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.