Investigating Main Effects and Moderators of Linear Number Board Games: A Meta-Analytic Review

The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis and review of studies reporting the quality of linear number board games. This meta-analysis included 18 preschool to second-grade studies with 123 effect sizes that yielded a statistically significant summary effect (g = .21, 95% CI (.08, 0.34), p = .004) on children’s mathematics outcomes. Nine moderators explained a statistically significant amount of variance in effect sizes, including the following broad categories: publication type, intervention dosage, other game player, control condition, outcome measure characteristics, and characteristics of the number board. Studies met 61% of study-reporting quality indicators, and analyses revealed that quality did not significantly moderate treatment effects. The results of this study offer several recommendations for researchers in developing and continuing to test the effects of linear number board games, as well as educators and parents who may use the games in their classrooms and homes with young children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Educational Research
Published
2025-11-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251383552
Primary Topic
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Main Effects and Moderators of Linear Number Board Games: A Meta-Analytic Review

Madison Cook, Peter Boedeker, Gena Nelson, Brianna L. Devlin et al.
Review of Educational Research
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
article

Investigating Main Effects and Moderators of Linear Number Board Games: A Meta-Analytic Review

Madison Cook, Peter Boedeker, Gena Nelson, Brianna L. Devlin, Taylor Lesner, Sara A. Schmitt, E Wilke, Marah Sutherland, Kevallyn R. Drake
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis and review of studies reporting the quality of linear number board games. This meta-analysis included 18 preschool to second-grade studies with 123 effect sizes that yielded a statistically significant summary effect (g = .21, 95% CI (.08, 0.34), p = .004) on children’s mathematics outcomes. Nine moderators explained a statistically significant amount of variance in effect sizes, including the following broad categories: publication type, intervention dosage, other game player, control condition, outcome measure characteristics, and characteristics of the number board. Studies met 61% of study-reporting quality indicators, and analyses revealed that quality did not significantly moderate treatment effects. The results of this study offer several recommendations for researchers in developing and continuing to test the effects of linear number board games, as well as educators and parents who may use the games in their classrooms and homes with young children.

Review of Educational Research
Baylor University (US), University of Oregon (US), Oregon Department of Education (US), Oregon Social Learning Center (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.