Ocular axial length and its associations: A systematic review

Background: Axial length is key in determining the underlying cause of refractive errors, including myopia. It is essential for assessing myopic progression or risk in patients. Aim: To systematically evaluate associations between ocular axial length and various ocular biometric, demographic, and anthropometric parameters. Method: A systematic review was conducted on studies highlighting the significance of axial length and its associations with anthropometric factors including height, and body mass index, ocular biometry factors including refractive error, corneal thickness and radius, crystalline lens, anterior chamber depth, vitreous chamber depth, retinal, choroidal, and scleral thicknesses, and demographic factors including age, ethnicity, race and gender. The review includes studies demonstrating the impact of axial length changes on the eye's refractive status. Results: Axial length is associated with anthropometric, ocular biometric, and demographic metrics, suggesting a complex interplay of factors. Increased axial length is linked to increased anterior chamber depth, vitreous chamber depth, body height, and myopia. Axial length is negatively associated with spherical equivalent refractive error, lens and choroidal thickness. Conclusion: The interplay of age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental factors complicates the generalization of axial length measurements. The strength and direction of these associations vary across studies, indicating complex relationships between factors. Tailored axial length norms based on individual characteristics are necessary, highlighting the need for population-based studies to minimize the generalization of ocular biometry in clinical practice. Contribution: This review emphasizes the need for population-specific norms in ocular biometry, considering factors like age, gender, ethnicity, and stature to enhance the precision and applicability of axial length measurements in clinical practice. The scarcity of instruments to measure axial length in primary and community eye care settings may hinder myopia control treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Vision and Eye Health
Published
2025-11-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v84i1.1063
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ocular axial length and its associations: A systematic review

Tanya Evans, Solani D. Mathebula, Andrew T. Chikara
1 citations
African Vision and Eye Health
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
1.35
article

Ocular axial length and its associations: A systematic review

Tanya Evans, Solani D. Mathebula, Andrew T. Chikara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Axial length is key in determining the underlying cause of refractive errors, including myopia. It is essential for assessing myopic progression or risk in patients. Aim: To systematically evaluate associations between ocular axial length and various ocular biometric, demographic, and anthropometric parameters. Method: A systematic review was conducted on studies highlighting the significance of axial length and its associations with anthropometric factors including height, and body mass index, ocular biometry factors including refractive error, corneal thickness and radius, crystalline lens, anterior chamber depth, vitreous chamber depth, retinal, choroidal, and scleral thicknesses, and demographic factors including age, ethnicity, race and gender. The review includes studies demonstrating the impact of axial length changes on the eye's refractive status. Results: Axial length is associated with anthropometric, ocular biometric, and demographic metrics, suggesting a complex interplay of factors. Increased axial length is linked to increased anterior chamber depth, vitreous chamber depth, body height, and myopia. Axial length is negatively associated with spherical equivalent refractive error, lens and choroidal thickness. Conclusion: The interplay of age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental factors complicates the generalization of axial length measurements. The strength and direction of these associations vary across studies, indicating complex relationships between factors. Tailored axial length norms based on individual characteristics are necessary, highlighting the need for population-based studies to minimize the generalization of ocular biometry in clinical practice. Contribution: This review emphasizes the need for population-specific norms in ocular biometry, considering factors like age, gender, ethnicity, and stature to enhance the precision and applicability of axial length measurements in clinical practice. The scarcity of instruments to measure axial length in primary and community eye care settings may hinder myopia control treatments.

African Vision and Eye HealthVol. 84(1)
University of Johannesburg (ZA), University of Limpopo (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.