US divestment in global health: disruption, uncertainty and response

The decisions of the US administration under Donald Trump in January 2025 to divest from many development activities have severely disrupted the state of affairs in global health. We analyse the extent of this disruption from two perspectives. First, we show that about 45 out of every 100 dollars spent on global health from 2019 to 2022 came from the US. Using data on bilateral official development assistance for health from the US, we identify recipient countries and health areas that will be most affected. We demonstrate differential sectoral impacts in more than a dozen countries-mainly within WHO's Africa region-which have been heavily reliant on US aid and other external sources to fund their health services. Severe fiscal constraints and/or ongoing conflicts and fragility in these countries further exacerbate potential impacts. Second, we analyse US contributions to UN organisations and other multilateral bodies most relevant to global health. This combined analysis provides a baseline for countries and organisations to understand the immediate financial fallout and the future risks within a changed global health financing system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Global Health
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019990
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

US divestment in global health: disruption, uncertainty and response

Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Christian Franz
3 citations
BMJ Global Health
Global Security and Public Health
12.60
article

US divestment in global health: disruption, uncertainty and response

Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Christian Franz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The decisions of the US administration under Donald Trump in January 2025 to divest from many development activities have severely disrupted the state of affairs in global health. We analyse the extent of this disruption from two perspectives. First, we show that about 45 out of every 100 dollars spent on global health from 2019 to 2022 came from the US. Using data on bilateral official development assistance for health from the US, we identify recipient countries and health areas that will be most affected. We demonstrate differential sectoral impacts in more than a dozen countries-mainly within WHO's Africa region-which have been heavily reliant on US aid and other external sources to fund their health services. Severe fiscal constraints and/or ongoing conflicts and fragility in these countries further exacerbate potential impacts. Second, we analyse US contributions to UN organisations and other multilateral bodies most relevant to global health. This combined analysis provides a baseline for countries and organisations to understand the immediate financial fallout and the future risks within a changed global health financing system.

BMJ Global HealthVol. 10(11)
Bielefeld University (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Climate Analytics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Global Security and Public Health
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.