Generational differences in gender equity and social justice beliefs among U.S. military women

Introduction U.S. military policies and culture are evolving alongside broader social attitudes. This study tested whether beliefs about gender equity and social justice differ between Generation X and Millennial women with U.S. military experience. Methods A cross-sectional, exploratory, comparative survey was conducted with 148 female-identifying adults with U.S. military experience (Generation X: n = 55; Millennials: n = 93; 16.9% currently serving). Beliefs were assessed using the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI) and the Social Justice Advocacy Scale (SJAS). Between-group differences were evaluated with Mann-Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Results No statistically significant generational differences were observed on the QDI ( U = 2133.50, p = 0.09) or the SJAS composite ( U = 2348.00, p = 0.51). Millennials scored higher than Generation X on the SJAS Confronting Discrimination subscale ( U = 1922.50, p = 0.01). Descriptive statistics (means, SDs, skewness) indicated generally positive endorsement of gender equity and social justice across cohorts. Discussion Findings are exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously given MTurk recruitment, modest sample size, and the absence of multivariate controls (e.g., education, race) or independent service verification. Null effects may reflect limited statistical power as well as genuine attitudinal convergence. Future research should draw verified active-duty and veteran samples, implement data-quality and service-verification procedures, adapt measures for military specificity, and use multivariate models to test mechanisms with greater precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Organizational Psychology
Published
2025-11-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2025.1667699
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generational differences in gender equity and social justice beliefs among U.S. military women

Andrale Jeanlouis
Frontiers in Organizational Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Generational differences in gender equity and social justice beliefs among U.S. military women

Andrale Jeanlouis
article en

Abstract

Introduction U.S. military policies and culture are evolving alongside broader social attitudes. This study tested whether beliefs about gender equity and social justice differ between Generation X and Millennial women with U.S. military experience. Methods A cross-sectional, exploratory, comparative survey was conducted with 148 female-identifying adults with U.S. military experience (Generation X: n = 55; Millennials: n = 93; 16.9% currently serving). Beliefs were assessed using the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI) and the Social Justice Advocacy Scale (SJAS). Between-group differences were evaluated with Mann-Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Results No statistically significant generational differences were observed on the QDI ( U = 2133.50, p = 0.09) or the SJAS composite ( U = 2348.00, p = 0.51). Millennials scored higher than Generation X on the SJAS Confronting Discrimination subscale ( U = 1922.50, p = 0.01). Descriptive statistics (means, SDs, skewness) indicated generally positive endorsement of gender equity and social justice across cohorts. Discussion Findings are exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously given MTurk recruitment, modest sample size, and the absence of multivariate controls (e.g., education, race) or independent service verification. Null effects may reflect limited statistical power as well as genuine attitudinal convergence. Future research should draw verified active-duty and veteran samples, implement data-quality and service-verification procedures, adapt measures for military specificity, and use multivariate models to test mechanisms with greater precision.

Frontiers in Organizational PsychologyVol. 3
University of Phoenix (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.