Distinct neural bases of proactive and reactive metacontrol during task switching

Metacontrol enables the retrieval of prior associations between situational contexts and control demands, allowing for rapid implementation of context-appropriate behavior. While its two behavioral modes-proactive and reactive-are well characterized, their underlying neural mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. To address this gap, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study to examine whether proactive and reactive metacontrol rely on shared or distinct neural substrates. Using a task-switching paradigm, we independently induced proactive metacontrol at the list level and reactive metacontrol at the item level within the same participants, allowing direct comparison between the two metacontrol modes. Proactive metacontrol engaged a distributed network including the superior frontal gyrus, angular gyrus, and frontal operculum-regions associated with sustained working memory and task-rule maintenance. In contrast, reactive metacontrol primarily recruited the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), consistent with its role in stimulus-driven conflict detection and resolution. Conjunction analysis revealed no overlapping regions between the two metacontrol modes. These findings further support the view that proactive and reactive metacontrol engage functionally and neurally distinct systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeuroImage
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121583
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct neural bases of proactive and reactive metacontrol during task switching

Moon Sun Kang, Yu‐Chin Chiu
NeuroImage
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Distinct neural bases of proactive and reactive metacontrol during task switching

Moon Sun Kang, Yu‐Chin Chiu
article en

Abstract

Metacontrol enables the retrieval of prior associations between situational contexts and control demands, allowing for rapid implementation of context-appropriate behavior. While its two behavioral modes-proactive and reactive-are well characterized, their underlying neural mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. To address this gap, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study to examine whether proactive and reactive metacontrol rely on shared or distinct neural substrates. Using a task-switching paradigm, we independently induced proactive metacontrol at the list level and reactive metacontrol at the item level within the same participants, allowing direct comparison between the two metacontrol modes. Proactive metacontrol engaged a distributed network including the superior frontal gyrus, angular gyrus, and frontal operculum-regions associated with sustained working memory and task-rule maintenance. In contrast, reactive metacontrol primarily recruited the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), consistent with its role in stimulus-driven conflict detection and resolution. Conjunction analysis revealed no overlapping regions between the two metacontrol modes. These findings further support the view that proactive and reactive metacontrol engage functionally and neurally distinct systems.

NeuroImageVol. 323
Duke University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.