Fully Automated Evaluation of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Normal Hearts: An Assessment of Accuracy in the Pediatric Population

Two-dimensional echocardiography has been shown to be a useful modality for analyzing cardiac deformation parameters. However, the clinical utility of strain analysis is limited by time and training required for manual border tracing. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a "hands-off," measurement program, Philips AutoStrain, for measurements of left-ventricular deformation in children. We hypothesize that AutoStrain may accurately calculate deformation measurements, but its performance may be limited in certain patient populations. Echocardiographic images from 168 patients were analyzed via AutoStrain using fully-automated and semiautomated approaches. GLS were manually traced offline as a reference standard. Autostrain outputs were analyzed for accuracy using percent difference from the reference standard and an accuracy scoring system designed to objectively quantify the precision of Autostrain border tracings at the apex and mitral annuli. Both fully-automated and semiautomated AutoStrain correlated well with manual GLS (Fully-automated R = 0.71, Semiautomated R = 0.90). However, the accuracy of AutoStrain was affected by image axis, patient age, and clear visualization of the LV apex. Fully-automated techniques may lead to a "hands-off" future in assessment of LV deformation in older children, but should be used cautiously in younger children until further refinements in the algorithm are performed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Cardiology
Published
2025-11-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-04074-2
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fully Automated Evaluation of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Normal Hearts: An Assessment of Accuracy in the Pediatric Population

Anirban Banerjee, Michael D. Quartermain, Matthew J. O’Connor, Daisuke Matsubara et al.
Pediatric Cardiology
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Fully Automated Evaluation of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Normal Hearts: An Assessment of Accuracy in the Pediatric Population

Anirban Banerjee, Michael D. Quartermain, Matthew J. O’Connor, Daisuke Matsubara, Michael Convery, Karen E. Miller, Hunter Kauffman
article en

Abstract

Two-dimensional echocardiography has been shown to be a useful modality for analyzing cardiac deformation parameters. However, the clinical utility of strain analysis is limited by time and training required for manual border tracing. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a "hands-off," measurement program, Philips AutoStrain, for measurements of left-ventricular deformation in children. We hypothesize that AutoStrain may accurately calculate deformation measurements, but its performance may be limited in certain patient populations. Echocardiographic images from 168 patients were analyzed via AutoStrain using fully-automated and semiautomated approaches. GLS were manually traced offline as a reference standard. Autostrain outputs were analyzed for accuracy using percent difference from the reference standard and an accuracy scoring system designed to objectively quantify the precision of Autostrain border tracings at the apex and mitral annuli. Both fully-automated and semiautomated AutoStrain correlated well with manual GLS (Fully-automated R = 0.71, Semiautomated R = 0.90). However, the accuracy of AutoStrain was affected by image axis, patient age, and clear visualization of the LV apex. Fully-automated techniques may lead to a "hands-off" future in assessment of LV deformation in older children, but should be used cautiously in younger children until further refinements in the algorithm are performed.

Pediatric Cardiology
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.