Trauma, boundaries, and connection: Rethinking touch in psychiatric nursing practice

This article reexamines the contested role of physical touch in psychiatric-mental health nursing, where institutional norms often restrict contact due to concerns about trauma, safety, and professional risk. While these restrictions are grounded in legitimate ethical concerns, they also reflect deeper institutional logics of surveillance, control, and epistemic reductionism. Drawing on theories of embodiment, trauma healing, feminist care ethics, and relational nursing, this article critically interrogates the consequences of disembodied care models that privilege procedural neutrality over relational presence. It argues for a reframing of therapeutic touch not as a clinical risk or fixed technique, but as an ethical, relational practice requiring contextual discernment, cultural sensitivity, and reflective engagement. By moving beyond binary positions-either prohibition or permissiveness-this article proposes a situated ethics of touch, grounded in the moral complexities of psychiatric nursing. Ultimately, it calls for institutional and pedagogical reforms that support nurses in navigating this complexity with attunement, agency, and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
Published
2025-11-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2025.152004
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trauma, boundaries, and connection: Rethinking touch in psychiatric nursing practice

Trae Stewart
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

Trauma, boundaries, and connection: Rethinking touch in psychiatric nursing practice

Trae Stewart
article en

Abstract

This article reexamines the contested role of physical touch in psychiatric-mental health nursing, where institutional norms often restrict contact due to concerns about trauma, safety, and professional risk. While these restrictions are grounded in legitimate ethical concerns, they also reflect deeper institutional logics of surveillance, control, and epistemic reductionism. Drawing on theories of embodiment, trauma healing, feminist care ethics, and relational nursing, this article critically interrogates the consequences of disembodied care models that privilege procedural neutrality over relational presence. It argues for a reframing of therapeutic touch not as a clinical risk or fixed technique, but as an ethical, relational practice requiring contextual discernment, cultural sensitivity, and reflective engagement. By moving beyond binary positions-either prohibition or permissiveness-this article proposes a situated ethics of touch, grounded in the moral complexities of psychiatric nursing. Ultimately, it calls for institutional and pedagogical reforms that support nurses in navigating this complexity with attunement, agency, and accountability.

Archives of Psychiatric NursingVol. 60
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.