Fluctuating (in)visibility. Addressing the gap between the attractive city and the inclusive city

The processes of urban space regeneration aimed at enhancing a city's attractiveness to international tourist flows are increasingly accompanied by the removal and control of vulnerable bodies. Despite rhetoric promoting the narrative of inclusive urban environments, these processes restrict living spaces and limit certain groups' access to the city, marking their identities, physicality, and ways of life as out of place. Consequently, the city, shaped by the tourist's gaze, becomes increasingly exclusionary. This article explores the potential coexistence of an attractive and inclusive city by critically analysing these processes through the theoretical framework of visibility. Discussing the multiple implications of visibility as a tool of spatial governance in terms of recognition, identification and control of bodies and identities, it emphasises the need to establish and preserve spaces of coexistence between light and shadow, ensuring protection and invisibility for marginalised and stigmatised subjects to acknowledge their presence in the urban landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106639
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fluctuating (in)visibility. Addressing the gap between the attractive city and the inclusive city

Alice Ranzini, Serena Olcuire
Cities
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Fluctuating (in)visibility. Addressing the gap between the attractive city and the inclusive city

Alice Ranzini, Serena Olcuire
article en

Abstract

The processes of urban space regeneration aimed at enhancing a city's attractiveness to international tourist flows are increasingly accompanied by the removal and control of vulnerable bodies. Despite rhetoric promoting the narrative of inclusive urban environments, these processes restrict living spaces and limit certain groups' access to the city, marking their identities, physicality, and ways of life as out of place. Consequently, the city, shaped by the tourist's gaze, becomes increasingly exclusionary. This article explores the potential coexistence of an attractive and inclusive city by critically analysing these processes through the theoretical framework of visibility. Discussing the multiple implications of visibility as a tool of spatial governance in terms of recognition, identification and control of bodies and identities, it emphasises the need to establish and preserve spaces of coexistence between light and shadow, ensuring protection and invisibility for marginalised and stigmatised subjects to acknowledge their presence in the urban landscape.

CitiesVol. 170
Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.