Robotic vs. open ureteral reimplantation: A retrospective comparative single‐centre series
The robotic approach appears to be non-inferior to the open approach in terms of stricture recurrence while being associated with a shorter length of hospital stay and lower estimated blood loss. More importantly, the present series raises questions regarding the long-term consequences of ureteral reimplantation and confirms the higher risk of failure in radiated patients.
Authors
- C. Haudebert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-0030)
- L. Freton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5624-1952)
- Karim Bensalah
- A. Bourillon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8712-5752)
- Lee C. Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4029-0669)
- G. Verhoest
- Romain Mathiéu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6866-7827)
- B. Peyronnet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-2825)
- Juliette Hascoet
- Claire Richard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4374-5665)
Institutions
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BJUI Compass
- Published
- 2025-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70110
- Primary Topic
- Ureteral procedures and complications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes