Why Oppose a Common Form of Practice? A Response to Parry ET Al

A recent paper by Parry et al. raises questions about the utility of unopposed practice (i.e., drills or “training form” practice). In this response we critique several arguments presented, offering examples in support of a more “nuanced” and balanced approach to coach planning and practice design. We conclude by emphasizing that complex issues such as coaching will almost inevitably require a range of tools to address specific contexts, meaning that claims for and application of a single theoretical perspective can often generate sub-optimum outcomes.