Impact of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Patient Experience, Opioid Use, and Healthcare Utilization in Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial

Non-pharmacological techniques designed to reduce anxiety, pain, and healthcare utilization have shown effectiveness in pediatric and non-surgical adult populations; however, their application has not been widely evaluated among adult surgical patients. This study randomized opioid-naive adults undergoing first-time, elective cardiac surgery to receive either targeted interventions from a trained “comfort coach” or usual care. The primary outcome assessed was healthcare utilization, specifically measured as the number of days at home within the first 30 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid use and patient-reported outcomes, collected via validated surveys. Additionally, 50 participants in the intervention group completed semi-structured qualitative interviews to explore their experience and acceptability of the intervention. Among the 160 randomized subjects (COACH: n = 77; USUAL CARE: n = 79), three did not undergo surgery and one was excluded for dementia, leaving 156 participants with a mean age of 63 years, 33% of whom were female. The primary outcome was not statistically different between groups, with the COACH group averaging 22.8 ± 4.4 days at home and the USUAL CARE group 22.0 ± 4.5 days (p = 0.26). Both groups exhibited similar decreases in anxiety and depression from preoperative clinic to 90-days postoperatively, and discharge pain scores averaged below 3/10. Notably, opioid prescriptions were larger than patient-reported consumption (p < 0.001). Qualitative analysis revealed the comfort coach intervention was highly valued, with participants identifying positive themes regarding the role and impact of the coach. These findings suggest that a comfort coach is a valued, novel healthcare role for cardiac surgery patients, and further research should prioritize comprehensive patient-reported outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Patient Experience Journal
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.2047
Primary Topic
Music Therapy and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Patient Experience, Opioid Use, and Healthcare Utilization in Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial

Donald S. Likosky, Varun G. Kathawate, Claudia Schwenzer, Alexander A. Brescia et al.
Patient Experience Journal
Music Therapy and Health
article

Impact of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Patient Experience, Opioid Use, and Healthcare Utilization in Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial

Donald S. Likosky, Varun G. Kathawate, Claudia Schwenzer, Alexander A. Brescia, Xiaoting Wu, Katelyn Monaghan, Alexander J Ivacko, G. Michael Deeb, Nickole L Garvey, Lindsay K Heering, Bailey Brown, Stefanie L. Peters, Michelle Riba, Frederick W. Bauer, Nicholas H. Osborne, Molly Dwyer‐White, Faraz Longi, James C Piazza, Mary E. Byrnes, Kiran Hari Lagisetty, Julie Piazza, Amanda M Kasperek, Jennifer F. Waljee, Sara M. Jafri, Jessica N. Jenkins, Melissa C. Webster, Christopher Varlamos
article en

Abstract

Non-pharmacological techniques designed to reduce anxiety, pain, and healthcare utilization have shown effectiveness in pediatric and non-surgical adult populations; however, their application has not been widely evaluated among adult surgical patients. This study randomized opioid-naive adults undergoing first-time, elective cardiac surgery to receive either targeted interventions from a trained “comfort coach” or usual care. The primary outcome assessed was healthcare utilization, specifically measured as the number of days at home within the first 30 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid use and patient-reported outcomes, collected via validated surveys. Additionally, 50 participants in the intervention group completed semi-structured qualitative interviews to explore their experience and acceptability of the intervention. Among the 160 randomized subjects (COACH: n = 77; USUAL CARE: n = 79), three did not undergo surgery and one was excluded for dementia, leaving 156 participants with a mean age of 63 years, 33% of whom were female. The primary outcome was not statistically different between groups, with the COACH group averaging 22.8 ± 4.4 days at home and the USUAL CARE group 22.0 ± 4.5 days (p = 0.26). Both groups exhibited similar decreases in anxiety and depression from preoperative clinic to 90-days postoperatively, and discharge pain scores averaged below 3/10. Notably, opioid prescriptions were larger than patient-reported consumption (p < 0.001). Qualitative analysis revealed the comfort coach intervention was highly valued, with participants identifying positive themes regarding the role and impact of the coach. These findings suggest that a comfort coach is a valued, novel healthcare role for cardiac surgery patients, and further research should prioritize comprehensive patient-reported outcomes.

Patient Experience JournalVol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Music Therapy and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.