Changing Myths Into Truths: Dispelling Physician Misconceptions on Patient Experience

Patient experience work can be viewed by some physicians as outside their scope of practice and therefore the responsibility of non-medical providers. Assumptions may also be made by providers about what patient experience work is and is not. These myths can make it difficult to pursue meaningful patient experience related work that is in fact rooted in evidence showing improved outcomes. Moreover, these myths can downplay the importance of patient experience improvement work discouraging physicians who may be interested from pursuing it. In order to combat common myths that can be propagated about patient experience, the authors will cite research to dispel commonly held beliefs and instead convert them into truths that demonstrate patient experience work truly is essential to healthcare organizations and should be pursued by clinicians as part of their non-clinical work.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Patient Experience Journal
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.2065
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changing Myths Into Truths: Dispelling Physician Misconceptions on Patient Experience

Susan Kroll, Swati Mehta, Michael H. Kanter, Winnie Lee et al.
Patient Experience Journal
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

Changing Myths Into Truths: Dispelling Physician Misconceptions on Patient Experience

Susan Kroll, Swati Mehta, Michael H. Kanter, Winnie Lee, Mikelle Key-Solle, Sephora Morrison, Susan Nathan, Alexie Puran, Liza DiLeo Thomas, Sachin Tushar Patel, Amit Singh, Sofie Rahman Morgan, Syed Meraj Ahmed, Paul A Lansdowne, Donald Wickline, James Castellone
article en

Abstract

Patient experience work can be viewed by some physicians as outside their scope of practice and therefore the responsibility of non-medical providers. Assumptions may also be made by providers about what patient experience work is and is not. These myths can make it difficult to pursue meaningful patient experience related work that is in fact rooted in evidence showing improved outcomes. Moreover, these myths can downplay the importance of patient experience improvement work discouraging physicians who may be interested from pursuing it. In order to combat common myths that can be propagated about patient experience, the authors will cite research to dispel commonly held beliefs and instead convert them into truths that demonstrate patient experience work truly is essential to healthcare organizations and should be pursued by clinicians as part of their non-clinical work.

Patient Experience JournalVol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Changing Myths Into Truths: Dispelling Physician Misconceptions on Patient Experience — Susan Kroll, Swati Mehta, et al. · Patient Experience Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS