Patients’ Experiences of Triage and Waiting in Emergency Departments: A Cross-sectional Survey

Objective: Patient experience is a core aspect of care quality. Patient experiences of emergency departments (EDs) have been examined, but there has been less focus on ED triage and waiting areas, often patients’ initial point of contact with a health service. This study aimed to understand patients’ experiences of ED triage and waiting room. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted across five Australian EDs to understand experiences of patients 14 years and over before, during and after triage. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and explored for correlations. Qualitative responses for suggested improvements were analysed using a conventional content analysis approach. Results: A total of 225 respondents completed the survey and reported they were generally satisfied with their triage and waiting room experience. Key areas for improvement were identified. Wait time information was reported to be provided to 24.3% of patients, and pain relief to 52.7% of those who desired it. Following triage respondents reported spending a median time of 60 minutes in the waiting room. Satisfaction with waiting was negatively correlated with increasing wait time (p < 0.001). Suggestions for improvements reflected a need for better staffing, facilities, and processes to support ED efficiencies and care needs while waiting. Conclusions: Wait time was a key influence on reported patient experience. Recommended measures to support the provision of information, comfort and person-centred care while waiting could help to improve this experience.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Patient Experience Journal
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.2062
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients’ Experiences of Triage and Waiting in Emergency Departments: A Cross-sectional Survey

Carrie Janerka, Fenella J. Gill, Leslie A. Gavin, PCC ED Triage Group
Patient Experience Journal
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Patients’ Experiences of Triage and Waiting in Emergency Departments: A Cross-sectional Survey

Carrie Janerka, Fenella J. Gill, Leslie A. Gavin, PCC ED Triage Group
article en

Abstract

Objective: Patient experience is a core aspect of care quality. Patient experiences of emergency departments (EDs) have been examined, but there has been less focus on ED triage and waiting areas, often patients’ initial point of contact with a health service. This study aimed to understand patients’ experiences of ED triage and waiting room. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted across five Australian EDs to understand experiences of patients 14 years and over before, during and after triage. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and explored for correlations. Qualitative responses for suggested improvements were analysed using a conventional content analysis approach. Results: A total of 225 respondents completed the survey and reported they were generally satisfied with their triage and waiting room experience. Key areas for improvement were identified. Wait time information was reported to be provided to 24.3% of patients, and pain relief to 52.7% of those who desired it. Following triage respondents reported spending a median time of 60 minutes in the waiting room. Satisfaction with waiting was negatively correlated with increasing wait time (p < 0.001). Suggestions for improvements reflected a need for better staffing, facilities, and processes to support ED efficiencies and care needs while waiting. Conclusions: Wait time was a key influence on reported patient experience. Recommended measures to support the provision of information, comfort and person-centred care while waiting could help to improve this experience.

Patient Experience JournalVol. 12(3)
Curtin University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.