Efficacy of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of COPD

Introduction: COPD is a familiar treatable disorder, Despite the availability of various treatment options, there is limited local evidence to guide the most effective and accessible treatment strategies in resource-constrained settings, Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) has been widely used as the standard of care for managing AECOPD; however, recent advancements, such as High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC), offer a promising alternative. Materials & Methods: There were 200 patients with acute exacerbations of COPD, both male and female, ranging in age from 20 to 70. Individuals suffering from systemic illnesses such as chronic liver disease, heart failure, renal failure, hematological disorders, bronchiectasis, pneumonia, life-threatening hypoxemia, agitation, confusion, bowel obstruction, vomiting, upper gastrointestinal surgery, hemodynamic instability requiring pressors or inotropes, trauma, facial burns, or recent upper airway or facial surgery were not included. Group A received non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Group B received high flow nasal oxygen treatment. The following parameters were used to determine the frequency of treatment success: pH >7.35, a decrease in PaCO2 of >15–20% with SaO2 (with or without oxygen) of >90%, and a decrease in respiratory rate of >20% compared with spontaneous breathing. All patients were monitored for 24 hours. Results: The study's age range was 20 to 70 years old, with a mean age of 57.79 ± 4.93 years. Patients in group A were 57.69 ± 5.01 years old on average, while those in the group B were 57.84 ± 4.91 years old. Out of 200 patients, 132 (66.0%) were males and 68 (34.0%) were females with male to female ratio of 1.9:1. At the end of 24 hours of treatment, 73 patients (73.0%) in group A (noninvasive ventilation) and 89 patients (89.0%) in group B (nasal high-flow oxygen) showed successful with 0.0039 significant p-value. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the efficacy of nasal high-flow oxygen is better than noninvasive ventilation in acute exacerbation of COPD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.1422
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of COPD

Tehzeeb Ashraf, Mohammed Abrar Hassan, Muhammad Asif, Niaz Liaqat
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Efficacy of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of COPD

Tehzeeb Ashraf, Mohammed Abrar Hassan, Muhammad Asif, Niaz Liaqat
article en

Abstract

Introduction: COPD is a familiar treatable disorder, Despite the availability of various treatment options, there is limited local evidence to guide the most effective and accessible treatment strategies in resource-constrained settings, Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) has been widely used as the standard of care for managing AECOPD; however, recent advancements, such as High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC), offer a promising alternative. Materials & Methods: There were 200 patients with acute exacerbations of COPD, both male and female, ranging in age from 20 to 70. Individuals suffering from systemic illnesses such as chronic liver disease, heart failure, renal failure, hematological disorders, bronchiectasis, pneumonia, life-threatening hypoxemia, agitation, confusion, bowel obstruction, vomiting, upper gastrointestinal surgery, hemodynamic instability requiring pressors or inotropes, trauma, facial burns, or recent upper airway or facial surgery were not included. Group A received non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Group B received high flow nasal oxygen treatment. The following parameters were used to determine the frequency of treatment success: pH >7.35, a decrease in PaCO2 of >15–20% with SaO2 (with or without oxygen) of >90%, and a decrease in respiratory rate of >20% compared with spontaneous breathing. All patients were monitored for 24 hours. Results: The study's age range was 20 to 70 years old, with a mean age of 57.79 ± 4.93 years. Patients in group A were 57.69 ± 5.01 years old on average, while those in the group B were 57.84 ± 4.91 years old. Out of 200 patients, 132 (66.0%) were males and 68 (34.0%) were females with male to female ratio of 1.9:1. At the end of 24 hours of treatment, 73 patients (73.0%) in group A (noninvasive ventilation) and 89 patients (89.0%) in group B (nasal high-flow oxygen) showed successful with 0.0039 significant p-value. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the efficacy of nasal high-flow oxygen is better than noninvasive ventilation in acute exacerbation of COPD.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(7)
Bahawal Victoria Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.