Contemporary Issues in Dealing with Stray Animals: A Comparative Legal Perspective

Abstract The purpose of this article is to conduct a legal analysis of the current Russian model for dealing with animals without owners (stray animals) and to evaluate its advantages and disadvantages. The authors demonstrate that the measures taken by the authorities are insufficient to reduce the number of stray animals. The problem must be viewed in the broader context. We propose a set of organisational measures, including compulsory registration of all domestic animals, a change in waste-management policy, the addition of new offences to the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, and the settlement of ownership of stray animals (the optimal solution is to assign them to municipal ownership, thereby codifying existing judicial practice of awarding compensation against municipalities for non-pecuniary damage suffered by citizens bitten by stray dogs). Informational, educational and cultural initiatives aimed at fostering a humane attitude towards animals are also required. Our findings may be of interest to countries facing similar challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/25889567-bja10065
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemporary Issues in Dealing with Stray Animals: A Comparative Legal Perspective

Aleksey Anisimov, I Volkov, Anatoliy Ryzhenkov
Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Contemporary Issues in Dealing with Stray Animals: A Comparative Legal Perspective

Aleksey Anisimov, I Volkov, Anatoliy Ryzhenkov
article en

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this article is to conduct a legal analysis of the current Russian model for dealing with animals without owners (stray animals) and to evaluate its advantages and disadvantages. The authors demonstrate that the measures taken by the authorities are insufficient to reduce the number of stray animals. The problem must be viewed in the broader context. We propose a set of organisational measures, including compulsory registration of all domestic animals, a change in waste-management policy, the addition of new offences to the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, and the settlement of ownership of stray animals (the optimal solution is to assign them to municipal ownership, thereby codifying existing judicial practice of awarding compensation against municipalities for non-pecuniary damage suffered by citizens bitten by stray dogs). Informational, educational and cultural initiatives aimed at fostering a humane attitude towards animals are also required. Our findings may be of interest to countries facing similar challenges.

Journal of Applied Animal Ethics ResearchVol. 7(2)
Kalmyk State University (RU), Don State Technical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.