Mitigating aggression toward AVs in mixed traffic: Effects of automated driving styles and human driving styles

• This study investigates driver behavior and subjective evaluation in mixed traffic. • Aggressive drivers behave more aggressively when interacting with defensive AVs. • Moderate drivers made more aggressive decisions when driving around defensive AVs. • Defensive drivers were not significantly influenced by the driving styles of AVs. • Automated and driver’s driving styles influence drivers’ risk perception and trust. As automated vehicles (AVs) technology advances, the deployment of AVs creates a mixed traffic environment in which human-driven vehicles (HVs) and AVs interact and coexist on the roads. This study investigated the effects of AVs’ automated driving styles on HV drivers’ decision-making, driving performance, and subjective evaluation while considering the manual driving styles of HV drivers. Thirty-six drivers participated in a driving simulator experiment, interacting with aggressive and defensive AVs in two separate blocks and experiencing four driving scenarios in each block. The results indicated that drivers with more aggressive driving styles tend to make less aggressive decisions when interacting with aggressive AVs compared to defensive AVs. In contrast, the decision-making of drivers with more defensive driving styles was not significantly influenced by AVs’ driving styles with which they interacted in mixed traffic. Regarding driving performance, all drivers demonstrated less aggressive behaviors when interacting with aggressive AVs than with defensive AVs, as reflected in longer time-to-collision (TTC). Additionally, human drivers reported lower trust and perceived higher risk when interacting with defensive AVs compared to aggressive AVs, with this effect varying based on their driving styles. These insights are crucial in informing the development of AV algorithms and establishing robust traffic regulations to enhance safe interactions between human drivers and AVs in mixed-traffic environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.103431
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating aggression toward AVs in mixed traffic: Effects of automated driving styles and human driving styles

Haitao Chen, Yiqi Zhang
1 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
article

Mitigating aggression toward AVs in mixed traffic: Effects of automated driving styles and human driving styles

Haitao Chen, Yiqi Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• This study investigates driver behavior and subjective evaluation in mixed traffic. • Aggressive drivers behave more aggressively when interacting with defensive AVs. • Moderate drivers made more aggressive decisions when driving around defensive AVs. • Defensive drivers were not significantly influenced by the driving styles of AVs. • Automated and driver’s driving styles influence drivers’ risk perception and trust. As automated vehicles (AVs) technology advances, the deployment of AVs creates a mixed traffic environment in which human-driven vehicles (HVs) and AVs interact and coexist on the roads. This study investigated the effects of AVs’ automated driving styles on HV drivers’ decision-making, driving performance, and subjective evaluation while considering the manual driving styles of HV drivers. Thirty-six drivers participated in a driving simulator experiment, interacting with aggressive and defensive AVs in two separate blocks and experiencing four driving scenarios in each block. The results indicated that drivers with more aggressive driving styles tend to make less aggressive decisions when interacting with aggressive AVs compared to defensive AVs. In contrast, the decision-making of drivers with more defensive driving styles was not significantly influenced by AVs’ driving styles with which they interacted in mixed traffic. Regarding driving performance, all drivers demonstrated less aggressive behaviors when interacting with aggressive AVs than with defensive AVs, as reflected in longer time-to-collision (TTC). Additionally, human drivers reported lower trust and perceived higher risk when interacting with defensive AVs compared to aggressive AVs, with this effect varying based on their driving styles. These insights are crucial in informing the development of AV algorithms and establishing robust traffic regulations to enhance safe interactions between human drivers and AVs in mixed-traffic environments.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 116
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.