Diagnostic Inclusion of Attachment Trauma: A Commentary on Farina and Schimmenti (2025).

Farina and Schimmenti (2025) offer an intriguing reconceptualization of attachment trauma as a developmental process arising from relational failures, even in the absence of identifiable traumatic events. We support their emphasis on clinical symptom constellations-such as dissociation, emotional dysregulation, and interpersonal detachment-as markers of attachment-related dysfunction. However, we suggest a change in emphasis. We argue that any diagnostic change might target dysfunction in the attachment system itself, rather than infer the presence of trauma. This distinction aligns with diagnostic frameworks that prioritize functional patterns over historical assumptions. We also encourage the development of trauma-informed principles specific to attachment disruptions. These refinements, we believe, would increase diagnostic clarity and better support treatment planning. We believe that the enhanced focus on attachment-related psychopathologies, as proposed by Farina and Schimmenti, is of value but would benefit from further attention to the issue of reliable measurement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250506
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Inclusion of Attachment Trauma: A Commentary on Farina and Schimmenti (2025).

Kenneth J. Thompson, Constance J Dalenberg
PubMed
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Diagnostic Inclusion of Attachment Trauma: A Commentary on Farina and Schimmenti (2025).

Kenneth J. Thompson, Constance J Dalenberg
article en

Abstract

Farina and Schimmenti (2025) offer an intriguing reconceptualization of attachment trauma as a developmental process arising from relational failures, even in the absence of identifiable traumatic events. We support their emphasis on clinical symptom constellations-such as dissociation, emotional dysregulation, and interpersonal detachment-as markers of attachment-related dysfunction. However, we suggest a change in emphasis. We argue that any diagnostic change might target dysfunction in the attachment system itself, rather than infer the presence of trauma. This distinction aligns with diagnostic frameworks that prioritize functional patterns over historical assumptions. We also encourage the development of trauma-informed principles specific to attachment disruptions. These refinements, we believe, would increase diagnostic clarity and better support treatment planning. We believe that the enhanced focus on attachment-related psychopathologies, as proposed by Farina and Schimmenti, is of value but would benefit from further attention to the issue of reliable measurement.

PubMedVol. 22(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagnostic Inclusion of Attachment Trauma: A Commentary on Farina and Schimmenti (2025). — Kenneth J. Thompson, Constance J Dalenberg · PubMed (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS