Great Wall: A Generalized Dose Optimization Design for Drug Combination Trials Maximizing Survival Benefit

Most phase I-II drug-combination trial designs assume that selecting the optimal dose combination based on early outcomes will also lead to maximum long-term survival benefits. However, this assumption is often violated in many clinical studies, generally due to high rates of relapse following the initial response. To address this problem, we propose the Great Wall design, a general dose optimization design for drug-combination trials. The Great Wall design employs a "divide-and-conquer" algorithm to address the issue of partial order of toxicity and uses early outcomes to eliminate dose combinations that are excessively toxic or less efficacious. It utilizes a dose randomization approach to construct a candidate set of the promising dose combinations balancing the toxicity and early efficacy outcomes. The patients assigned to the candidate set are followed to collect the survival outcomes and the final optimal dose combination is then selected to maximize the survival benefit. The simulation studies confirm the desirable operating characteristics of the Great Wall design under various clinical settings. R codes are also provided to facilitate the application. The Great Wall design is modular and practically useful in settings where investigators plan to follow patients long enough to assess survival outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70049
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Great Wall: A Generalized Dose Optimization Design for Drug Combination Trials Maximizing Survival Benefit

Yong Zang, Suyu Liu, Yingjie Qiu, Yan Han et al.
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Great Wall: A Generalized Dose Optimization Design for Drug Combination Trials Maximizing Survival Benefit

Yong Zang, Suyu Liu, Yingjie Qiu, Yan Han, Isabella Wan, Lang Li, Yi Zhao
article en

Abstract

Most phase I-II drug-combination trial designs assume that selecting the optimal dose combination based on early outcomes will also lead to maximum long-term survival benefits. However, this assumption is often violated in many clinical studies, generally due to high rates of relapse following the initial response. To address this problem, we propose the Great Wall design, a general dose optimization design for drug-combination trials. The Great Wall design employs a "divide-and-conquer" algorithm to address the issue of partial order of toxicity and uses early outcomes to eliminate dose combinations that are excessively toxic or less efficacious. It utilizes a dose randomization approach to construct a candidate set of the promising dose combinations balancing the toxicity and early efficacy outcomes. The patients assigned to the candidate set are followed to collect the survival outcomes and the final optimal dose combination is then selected to maximize the survival benefit. The simulation studies confirm the desirable operating characteristics of the Great Wall design under various clinical settings. R codes are also provided to facilitate the application. The Great Wall design is modular and practically useful in settings where investigators plan to follow patients long enough to assess survival outcomes.

Pharmaceutical StatisticsVol. 24(6)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Toronto (CA), Indiana University School of Medicine, The Ohio State University (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Ralph W. and Grace M. Showalter Research Trust Fund, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.