Characterization of woodsmoke generated in the air pollution exposure lab and comparison to diesel exhaust

To address the increasing concern regarding woodsmoke (WS) exposure and better understand its effects on human health, a WS generation system was built in the Air Pollution Exposure Laboratory to facilitate future controlled human exposure studies. Ground lodgepole pine was burned to generate WS, with PM2.5 concentrations of approximately 500 µg/m3 obtained. The WS produced by this system was characterized and directly compared with diesel exhaust (DE) generated and collected at the same facility. For gases, WS showed slight increases in CO and CO2 compared with filtered air (FA), whereas DE had significantly higher levels of NOx, CO, CO2, and total volatile organic compounds than FA. The non-refractory composition of WS aerosols was approximately 98% organics, 0.2% ammonium, 1.3% nitrate, and 0.2% sulfate. Among the organic species, the fraction of oxygenated species was much higher in WS aerosols than in DE aerosols. Moreover, WS aerosols had higher concentrations of Cd compared with DE aerosols. Greater oxidative potential was also observed for WS compared with DE, with dithiothreitol consumption rates of 0.0090 nmol/min/µg. This study established a controlled human exposure platform for WS and described the methods used for analyzing and comparing the concentrations, particulate morphologies, chemical compositions, and oxidative potentials of different lab-generated pollutants. The observed differences between WS and DE in oxidative potential and amounts of gases, organic species, and metals provide a foundation for investigating how specific air pollution components differentially impact human health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf148
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of woodsmoke generated in the air pollution exposure lab and comparison to diesel exhaust

Christopher F. Rider, Julia Zaks, Carley Schwartz, Vikram Choudhary et al.
Toxicological Sciences
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Characterization of woodsmoke generated in the air pollution exposure lab and comparison to diesel exhaust

Christopher F. Rider, Julia Zaks, Carley Schwartz, Vikram Choudhary, Yu Xi, Allan K. Bertram, K. D. Hardy, Christopher Carlsten
article en

Abstract

To address the increasing concern regarding woodsmoke (WS) exposure and better understand its effects on human health, a WS generation system was built in the Air Pollution Exposure Laboratory to facilitate future controlled human exposure studies. Ground lodgepole pine was burned to generate WS, with PM2.5 concentrations of approximately 500 µg/m3 obtained. The WS produced by this system was characterized and directly compared with diesel exhaust (DE) generated and collected at the same facility. For gases, WS showed slight increases in CO and CO2 compared with filtered air (FA), whereas DE had significantly higher levels of NOx, CO, CO2, and total volatile organic compounds than FA. The non-refractory composition of WS aerosols was approximately 98% organics, 0.2% ammonium, 1.3% nitrate, and 0.2% sulfate. Among the organic species, the fraction of oxygenated species was much higher in WS aerosols than in DE aerosols. Moreover, WS aerosols had higher concentrations of Cd compared with DE aerosols. Greater oxidative potential was also observed for WS compared with DE, with dithiothreitol consumption rates of 0.0090 nmol/min/µg. This study established a controlled human exposure platform for WS and described the methods used for analyzing and comparing the concentrations, particulate morphologies, chemical compositions, and oxidative potentials of different lab-generated pollutants. The observed differences between WS and DE in oxidative potential and amounts of gases, organic species, and metals provide a foundation for investigating how specific air pollution components differentially impact human health.

Toxicological SciencesVol. 209(1)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, U.S. Forest Service, Health Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Rocky Mountain Research Station
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.