The relationship between cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose index and hypertension: A study based on two national cohorts

BackgroundHypertension remains a major global public health concern and is strongly linked to metabolic dysregulation. The cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index, a recently proposed composite marker that integrates lipid and glycemic parameters, has not been comprehensively investigated in relation to hypertension.MethodsData from two nationally representative cohorts were analyzed: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) for longitudinal evaluation and the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for cross-sectional assessment. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between the cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index and hypertension. Restricted cubic spline models were applied to assess potential non-linear relationships, while receiver operating characteristic curves were employed to evaluate the discriminative capacity of the cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to confirm the robustness of the findings.ResultsA total of 4031 participants from CHARLS and 10,355 participants from NHANES were included. Higher cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index values were significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of hypertension in both cohorts. In the CHARLS cohort, each one-unit increase in cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose corresponded to a 1.60-fold higher risk of hypertension after full adjustment, while in the NHANES cohort, the risk was 1.73-fold higher. Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a linear association between cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose and hypertension. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated modest discriminative ability (AUC: 0.566 in CHARLS; 0.612 in NHANES). Sensitivity analyses supported the consistency and stability of these results.ConclusionThe cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index shows an independent and positive association with hypertension across diverse populations. However, its discriminative power as a standalone marker remains modest and should be interpreted with caution. Further prospective and mechanistic studies are needed to validate its clinical applicability and to explore the potential value of integrating cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose with other cardiometabolic risk indicators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Progress
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251396781
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose index and hypertension: A study based on two national cohorts

Su-Ming Weng, Zhe Zhang, Mengting Chen, Lingling Zhao et al.
6 citations
Science Progress
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
7.77
article

The relationship between cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose index and hypertension: A study based on two national cohorts

Su-Ming Weng, Zhe Zhang, Mengting Chen, Lingling Zhao, Dong Cai
article en
6 citations

Abstract

BackgroundHypertension remains a major global public health concern and is strongly linked to metabolic dysregulation. The cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index, a recently proposed composite marker that integrates lipid and glycemic parameters, has not been comprehensively investigated in relation to hypertension.MethodsData from two nationally representative cohorts were analyzed: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) for longitudinal evaluation and the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for cross-sectional assessment. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between the cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index and hypertension. Restricted cubic spline models were applied to assess potential non-linear relationships, while receiver operating characteristic curves were employed to evaluate the discriminative capacity of the cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to confirm the robustness of the findings.ResultsA total of 4031 participants from CHARLS and 10,355 participants from NHANES were included. Higher cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index values were significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of hypertension in both cohorts. In the CHARLS cohort, each one-unit increase in cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose corresponded to a 1.60-fold higher risk of hypertension after full adjustment, while in the NHANES cohort, the risk was 1.73-fold higher. Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a linear association between cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose and hypertension. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated modest discriminative ability (AUC: 0.566 in CHARLS; 0.612 in NHANES). Sensitivity analyses supported the consistency and stability of these results.ConclusionThe cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index shows an independent and positive association with hypertension across diverse populations. However, its discriminative power as a standalone marker remains modest and should be interpreted with caution. Further prospective and mechanistic studies are needed to validate its clinical applicability and to explore the potential value of integrating cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose with other cardiometabolic risk indicators.

Science ProgressVol. 108(4)
Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
7.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.