Survival Remains High in Griffon Vultures 40 Years After Reintroduction

ABSTRACT The long‐term success of conservation translocations not only relies on the survival and reproductive success of released individuals, but also on addressing challenges related to population expansion up to natural regulation, whether exceeding expected numbers, or hindered by environmental or anthropogenic changes over time. Using the 40‐year dataset of intensive griffon vulture ( Gyps fulvus ) monitoring since its reintroduction in French Grands Causses in 1981, we performed a multi‐strata (multi‐states and multi‐events) mark‐recapture analysis to estimate survival probabilities. We (1) integrated mark‐loss and remarking events, (2) explored a variety of anthropic and environmental factors that may affect survival in this population, such as wind turbines, feeding stations or density dependence. Overall, the life histories of 1506 wild‐born individuals were computed, yielding juvenile survival probabilities of 0.66 (95% CI = 0.605–0.707), immature survival probabilities of 0.91 (95% CI = 0.872–0.937) and adult probabilities of 0.94 (95% CI = 0.917–0.952). Even though founder individuals were released four decades ago, and the population has grown continuously ever since, no effect of density dependence or of potential anthropic threats was detected on survival. Beyond bringing another piece of evidence supporting the relevance of this translocation program, as well as the benefit of regular monitoring efforts over several decades, our findings illustrate the importance of considering the maximum carrying capacity once wildlife populations are restored. Questioning the number of individuals to be expected may indeed allow anticipating both adaptive monitoring and management strategies, and ultimately, ensure the long‐term viability of restored populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Conservation
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.70044
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival Remains High in Griffon Vultures 40 Years After Reintroduction

Bruno Descaves, Robert P. L. Straughan, Charlotte Lorand, Olivier Duriez et al.
3 citations
Animal Conservation
Avian ecology and behavior
5.15
article

Survival Remains High in Griffon Vultures 40 Years After Reintroduction

Bruno Descaves, Robert P. L. Straughan, Charlotte Lorand, Olivier Duriez, Philippe Lécuyer, Jean‐Baptiste Mihoub, Léa Giraud, François Sarrazin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The long‐term success of conservation translocations not only relies on the survival and reproductive success of released individuals, but also on addressing challenges related to population expansion up to natural regulation, whether exceeding expected numbers, or hindered by environmental or anthropogenic changes over time. Using the 40‐year dataset of intensive griffon vulture ( Gyps fulvus ) monitoring since its reintroduction in French Grands Causses in 1981, we performed a multi‐strata (multi‐states and multi‐events) mark‐recapture analysis to estimate survival probabilities. We (1) integrated mark‐loss and remarking events, (2) explored a variety of anthropic and environmental factors that may affect survival in this population, such as wind turbines, feeding stations or density dependence. Overall, the life histories of 1506 wild‐born individuals were computed, yielding juvenile survival probabilities of 0.66 (95% CI = 0.605–0.707), immature survival probabilities of 0.91 (95% CI = 0.872–0.937) and adult probabilities of 0.94 (95% CI = 0.917–0.952). Even though founder individuals were released four decades ago, and the population has grown continuously ever since, no effect of density dependence or of potential anthropic threats was detected on survival. Beyond bringing another piece of evidence supporting the relevance of this translocation program, as well as the benefit of regular monitoring efforts over several decades, our findings illustrate the importance of considering the maximum carrying capacity once wildlife populations are restored. Questioning the number of individuals to be expected may indeed allow anticipating both adaptive monitoring and management strategies, and ultimately, ensure the long‐term viability of restored populations.

Animal Conservation
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier (FR), Centre d'Écologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (FR), University of Inland Norway (NO), Parc national des Cévennes (FR)
European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Avian ecology and behavior
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.