Do research fellowships impact future earnings? Evidence from the São Paulo Research Foundation

Abstract Competitive fellowships are widely used for allocating limited public research resources, but their private returns to recipients remain largely unexplored. This paper examines fellowships awarded by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil’s largest state-level research funding agency, by estimating their impact on former recipients’ hourly wages across four levels: undergraduate, Master’s, Ph.D. and postdoctoral. The analysis focuses on the intensive margin—individuals employed both before and after the fellowship—and applies a difference-in-differences framework with individual fixed effects. It draws on employment data for approved and rejected applicants, covering up to 3 years before and 10 years after the fellowship period. Results indicate that FAPESP fellowships have a statistically significant positive effect on the future earnings of fellows, averaging 4.5%. The estimated effect persists over time and increases after the initial years, starting at 2.7% in the first year and rising to 4.8% or more in most years from the fifth onward. The positive association appears across all levels, though results are less robust under alternative specifications for undergraduate and Master’s recipients. The impact estimates are larger at the most advanced stages: 7.6% for Ph.D. and 4% for postdoctoral fellowships. These findings underscore the importance of research funding in training highly qualified personnel for both academic and non-academic sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Evaluation
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf051
Citations
1
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do research fellowships impact future earnings? Evidence from the São Paulo Research Foundation

F. Negri, Daniel Gama e Colombo
1 citations
Research Evaluation
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
0.46
article

Do research fellowships impact future earnings? Evidence from the São Paulo Research Foundation

F. Negri, Daniel Gama e Colombo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Competitive fellowships are widely used for allocating limited public research resources, but their private returns to recipients remain largely unexplored. This paper examines fellowships awarded by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil’s largest state-level research funding agency, by estimating their impact on former recipients’ hourly wages across four levels: undergraduate, Master’s, Ph.D. and postdoctoral. The analysis focuses on the intensive margin—individuals employed both before and after the fellowship—and applies a difference-in-differences framework with individual fixed effects. It draws on employment data for approved and rejected applicants, covering up to 3 years before and 10 years after the fellowship period. Results indicate that FAPESP fellowships have a statistically significant positive effect on the future earnings of fellows, averaging 4.5%. The estimated effect persists over time and increases after the initial years, starting at 2.7% in the first year and rising to 4.8% or more in most years from the fifth onward. The positive association appears across all levels, though results are less robust under alternative specifications for undergraduate and Master’s recipients. The impact estimates are larger at the most advanced stages: 7.6% for Ph.D. and 4% for postdoctoral fellowships. These findings underscore the importance of research funding in training highly qualified personnel for both academic and non-academic sectors.

Research EvaluationVol. 34
Institute of Applied Economic Research (BR), Institute for Applied Economic Research (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.